Open editorialbot opened 2 weeks ago
Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.03 s (1150.0 files/s, 112061.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 11 406 507 1246
TeX 1 21 0 234
Markdown 4 85 0 170
reStructuredText 6 113 91 108
YAML 4 18 0 92
XML 6 0 0 55
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
Jupyter Notebook 1 0 276 25
make 1 4 7 9
INI 1 0 0 6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 36 655 882 1971
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
34 iosefa
22 Iosefa Percival
4 benleamon
Paper file info:
π Wordcount for paper.md
is 899
β
The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
β
License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
β
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.11.017 is OK
- 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.034 is OK
- 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00281-4 is OK
- 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112061 is OK
- 10.2307/1934145 is OK
- 10.3390/rs12030413 is OK
- 10.1080/22797254.2024.2315413 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118709 is OK
- 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119343 is OK
- 10.5281/ZENODO.13151991 is OK
π‘ SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Airborne LiDAR Data Manipulation and Visualization...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Efficient LiDAR processing software
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Global Mapper: GIS and Mapping Software
- No DOI given, and none found for title: FUSION/LDV: LiDAR Processing and Visualization Sof...
β MISSING DOIs
- 10.32614/cran.package.leafr may be a valid DOI for title: leafR: Calculates the Leaf Area Index (LAD) and Ot...
β INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
π @iosefa, @npucino, and @giswqs, Welcome to the review thread for the paper. All communication regarding this submission will take place here.
Please start by reading the "Reviewer instructions & questions" in the first comment above.
Reviewers, please create your checklists outlining JOSS requirements. As you assess the submission, mark any items you believe have been satisfied. Additionally, refer to the JOSS reviewer guidelines linked at the top of this thread.
Our aim is to collaborate with authors to help them meet our criteria. Reviewers are encouraged to submit issues and pull requests directly on the software repository. When doing so, please tag https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7314 in the issue to create a link to this thread, enabling easy tracking. Please feel free to post comments, questions, and suggestions as they arise, rather than waiting until the entire package is reviewed.
We target completing reviews within 4-6 weeks, but please initiate your review well in advance. JOSS reviews are iterative, and your early feedback will help us stay on schedule.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@iosefa<!--end-author-handle-- (Joseph Emile Honour Percival) Repository: https://github.com/iosefa/PyForestScan Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): docs/joss-paper Version: v0.1.6 Editor: !--editor-->@mengqi-z<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @npucino, @giswqs Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@npucino & @giswqs, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @mengqi-z know.
β¨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest β¨
Checklists
π Checklist for @giswqs
π Checklist for @npucino