Open editorialbot opened 2 weeks ago
Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=3.09 s (39.2 files/s, 755168.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jupyter Notebook 61 0 2310055 10280
HTML 4 548 0 3900
Python 23 1041 2156 1934
YAML 7 40 22 223
Markdown 7 62 0 134
TeX 1 11 0 104
reStructuredText 15 58 90 69
TOML 1 7 2 53
Bourne Shell 2 2 3 5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 121 1769 2312328 16702
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
115 FredDeCeuster
32 Frederik De Ceuster
Paper file info:
π Wordcount for paper.md
is 722
β
The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
π‘ License found: GNU General Public License v3.0
(Check here for OSI approval)
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
β
OK DOIs
- 10.21105/joss.03905 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2402.18525 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202347376 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202346116 is OK
- 10.1038/s41550-023-02154-y is OK
π‘ SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Automatic differentiation in PyTorch
- No DOI given, and none found for title: PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Dee...
β MISSING DOIs
- None
β INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
I will get started on my review after the JWST deadline and probably the STScI Flux Calibration workshop. Hence very late Oct or early Nov. Will try to get it before then, but not sure I will be able to. Just a FYI.
@editorialbot add @s-goldman as reviewer
@s-goldman added to the reviewers list!
@s-goldman the review will take place in this thread. Thank you so much for agreeing to review!
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@FredDeCeuster<!--end-author-handle-- (Frederik De Ceuster) Repository: https://github.com/Magritte-code/pomme Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: v0.0.16 Editor: !--editor-->@JBorrow<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @karllark, @s-goldman Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@karllark, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @JBorrow know.
β¨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest β¨
Checklists
π Checklist for @s-goldman