openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
717 stars 38 forks source link

[REVIEW]: bayes_traj: A Python package for Bayesian trajectory analysis #7323

Open editorialbot opened 4 days ago

editorialbot commented 4 days ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@jcross186<!--end-author-handle-- (James Ross) Repository: https://github.com/acil-bwh/bayes_traj/ Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: v1.0.1 Editor: !--editor-->@majensen<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @gvieralopez, @lindemann09 Archive: Pending

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2f99457ed2a1a9255eb65be5923f19be"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2f99457ed2a1a9255eb65be5923f19be/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2f99457ed2a1a9255eb65be5923f19be/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2f99457ed2a1a9255eb65be5923f19be)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@gvieralopez & @lindemann09, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:

@editorialbot generate my checklist

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @majensen know.

Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest

Checklists

@gvieralopez, please create your checklist typing: @editorialbot generate my checklist

@lindemann09, please create your checklist typing: @editorialbot generate my checklist

editorialbot commented 4 days ago

Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 4 days ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.21 s (270.5 files/s, 446707.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSV                             11              0              0          76511
Python                          26           1178           1960           4743
Markdown                         8            397              0           2011
Jupyter Notebook                 5              0           5145            292
TeX                              1             18              0            144
YAML                             2              6              5             63
XML                              3              0              0              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            56           1599           7110          83770
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   445  James Ross
    31  Fritz Obermeyer
     2  jcross186
     1  acil-bwh
editorialbot commented 4 days ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 671

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 4 days ago

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

editorialbot commented 4 days ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1037/met0000359 is OK
- 10.1016/j.alcr.2019.100323 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102408 is OK
- 10.1109/TMI.2016.2608782 is OK
- 10.1056/NEJMoa1411532 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas 1.0. 5
- No DOI given, and none found for title: PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Dee...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Array programming with NumPy
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Longitudinal modeling of lung function trajectorie...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Lung function trajectories in health and disease
- No DOI given, and none found for title: COPDGene\textregistered 2019: redefining the diagn...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 4 days ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left: