Open editorialbot opened 2 days ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.03 s (1868.3 files/s, 139688.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markdown 16 470 0 1167
Python 14 216 335 863
YAML 13 19 18 276
TOML 1 13 4 71
TeX 1 2 0 41
Bourne Shell 2 2 2 15
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 47 722 359 2433
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
500 Wytamma Wirth
6 Robert Turnbull
1 Katherine Eaton
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.1186/s12864-022-08358-2 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010705 is OK
- 10.12688/f1000research.29032.2 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- None
❌ MISSING DOIs
- None
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 993
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
A reproducible Snakemake pipeline to analyse Illumina paired-end data from ChiP-Seq experiments
Submitting author: @mgalland
Handling editor: @brainstorm (Retired)
Reviewers: @vladsaveliev
Similarity score: 0.7195
Sequana: a Set of Snakemake NGS pipelines
Submitting author: @cokelaer
Handling editor: @pjotrp (Retired)
Reviewers: @bow
Similarity score: 0.7149
Acanthophis: a comprehensive plant hologenomics pipeline
Submitting author: @kdm9
Handling editor: @marcosvital (Active)
Reviewers: @bricoletc, @gbouras13, @abhishektiwari
Similarity score: 0.6926
Augur: a bioinformatics toolkit for phylogenetic analyses of human pathogens
Submitting author: @huddlej
Handling editor: @majensen (Active)
Reviewers: @dcnickle, @Maghnuso
Similarity score: 0.6916
funsies: A minimalist, distributed and dynamic workflow engine
Submitting author: @clavigne
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @gflofst, @vijaysm
Similarity score: 0.6876
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
👋 @Wytamma - thanks for your submission. Due to the relatively small amount of code, the editors will now discuss if it meets the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. You should hear back in a week or two.
@editorialbot query scope
Submission flagged for editorial review.
Thanks @danielskatz,
Just FYI the majority of the code is in the snk sister project Snk-CLI. There are two different projects so that users can use Snk-CLI without depending on the main Snk application. Details here -> https://snk.wytamma.com/workflow_packages and in the paper.md.
Kind regards,
Wytamma
Thanks @Wytamma
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@wytamma<!--end-author-handle-- (Wytamma Wirth) Repository: https://github.com/Wytamma/snk Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.30.1 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @wytamma. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@wytamma if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: