search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
725 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: UXsim: lightweight mesoscopic traffic flow simulator in pure Python #7332

Open editorialbot opened 1 month ago

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@toruseo<!--end-author-handle-- (Toru Seo) Repository: https://github.com/toruseo/UXsim Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): JOSS Version: v1.6.0 Editor: !--editor-->@kanishkan91<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Chris Vernon

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6d109398597b438cb9b12a9f744346c"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6d109398597b438cb9b12a9f744346c/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6d109398597b438cb9b12a9f744346c/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6d109398597b438cb9b12a9f744346c)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @toruseo. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@toruseo if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.01 s (531.9 files/s, 59308.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markdown                         2             49              0            178
TeX                              1             21              0            174
YAML                             1              1              4             19
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             4             71              4            371
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   266  Toru Seo
    12  Ewout ter Hoeven
     1  dependabot[bot]
editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1795

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

License info:

🔴 Failed to discover a valid open source license

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.

crvernon commented 1 month ago

:wave: @toruseo - Could you please provide a branch that has both the code of your repo and the paper components needed for JOSS within the same branch? This will help our editorialbot to find what it needs.

toruseo commented 1 month ago

@crvernon Sorry for my misunderstanding. Now branch JOSS has both of the paper and software code.

Nitnelav commented 1 month ago

Hi ! I'd be happy to volunteer as a reviewer if needed. I'm not a traffic engineer but I am using multi-agent mesoscopic traffic models in my work. It would be my first review here so i'll try to strictly follow the guidelines.

crvernon commented 1 month ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.

crvernon commented 1 month ago

Hi @Nitnelav, I'll keep that in mind when I get an editor assigned to this submission. How did you hear about this review by the way?

crvernon commented 1 month ago

@openjournals/dev can you help out the the PDF generation action failure above? Thanks!

Nitnelav commented 1 month ago

Hi @Nitnelav, I'll keep that in mind when I get an editor assigned to this submission. How did you hear about this review by the way?

Cool, thanks !

I had an eye on the joss-reviews issues for some time, looking for one I could volunteer to review. I was hipped about JOSS at an "open source in acoustics" workshop and I found the open submission and reviewing process on github very interesting. Then we (the UMRAE team) decided to submit our NoiseModelling software to JOSS (work is in progress). And so I thought I'd participate to the reviewing process to see how it goes !

xuanxu commented 1 month ago

The error in the PDF generation comes from this date in the paper's metadata not following the expected syntax .

toruseo commented 1 month ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

toruseo commented 1 month ago

It is fixed now. Thanks

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

TraViA: a Traffic data Visualization and Annotation tool in Python Submitting author: @OlgerSiebinga Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active) Reviewers: @rusu24edward, @tomalrussell Similarity score: 0.7272

RidePy: A fast and modular framework for simulating ridepooling systems Submitting author: @fxjung Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active) Reviewers: @xoolive, @abhishektiwari, @ixjlyons Similarity score: 0.7073

AirTrafficSim: An open-source web-based air traffic simulation platform. Submitting author: @kyfrankie Handling editor: @AoifeHughes (Retired) Reviewers: @gmingas, @xoolive Similarity score: 0.7008

TDLM: An R package for a systematic comparison of trip distribution laws and models Submitting author: @maximelenormand Handling editor: @crvernon (Active) Reviewers: @kanishkan91, @MAnalytics Similarity score: 0.6870

CoSApp: a Python library to create, simulate and design complex systems. Submitting author: @elac-safran Handling editor: @HaoZeke (Active) Reviewers: @jbussemaker, @chenxinye Similarity score: 0.6853

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

crvernon commented 1 month ago

@editorialbot invite @kanishkan91 as editor

:wave: @kanishkan91 - can you edit this one? Thanks!

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

kanishkan91 commented 1 month ago

@crvernon Yup, I can take this one

crvernon commented 1 month ago

@editorialbot assign @kanishkan91 as editor

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Assigned! @kanishkan91 is now the editor

toruseo commented 3 weeks ago

@kanishkan91 Thank you very much for handling my paper.

Do I need to do something to advance the review process? Or should I just wait? Sorry for interrupting you. I understand that the editorial process take some time, but I am not familiar with this submission system.

kanishkan91 commented 2 weeks ago

@toruseo I don't think anything is required from your side. Though if you had potential reviewers in mind (without a conflict of interest) feel free to post their GitHub IDs here. I plan on getting this review started within the next week.

toruseo commented 2 weeks ago

Thank you.

Regarding potential reviewers, Nitnelav kindly volunteered as a reviewer (pls see https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7332#issuecomment-2404335660 for his motivation). The authors of the related papers and the paper cited by my manuscript would be also great.