Closed editorialbot closed 1 day ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 is OK
- 10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_137-1 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stv191 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7959 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ab258d is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01393 is OK
- 10.1007/BF00648343 is OK
- 10.1086/342285 is OK
- 10.1086/167757 is OK
- 10.1086/156444 is OK
- 10.1007/s00159-014-0072-0 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: A Poweful Test for Weak Periodic Signals with Unkn...
❌ MISSING DOIs
- None
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.31 s (438.4 files/s, 202707.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 89 9711 15953 26967
reStructuredText 22 585 385 1244
Jupyter Notebook 1 0 5087 371
Markdown 6 92 0 364
SVG 1 1 1 364
TeX 2 27 0 363
YAML 9 37 45 361
DOS Batch 1 21 1 148
make 1 22 5 107
INI 1 15 0 86
TOML 1 11 0 42
CSS 1 1 0 6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 135 10523 21477 30423
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
1741 Matteo Bachetti
447 Daniela Huppenkothen
127 Himanshu Mishra
103 mbachett
84 John Swinbank
78 Swapnil Sharma
68 Usman Mahmood
65 Haroon Rashid
63 Abbie Stevens
60 Usman
58 Amogh Desai
48 Gaurav17Joshi
43 Mihir Tripathi
33 Gullo
32 Abigail Stevens
26 Evandro M. Ribeiro
26 pupperemeritus
22 Brigitta Sipocz
19 Evandro M Ribeiro
17 Dhruv Vats
14 Guglielmo Mastroserio
12 tappina
8 omargamal8
7 Megan Davis
7 Stuart Mumford
6 Mihir
6 devanshshukla99
5 Abhinav Kumar
5 Achilles Rasquinha
5 Brigitta Sipőcz
5 Riccardo Campana
5 Tomasz Kolek
5 _youteakay
5 parkma99
4 Evandro Martinez Ribeiro
4 Nitish Garg
4 da-ta-vinci21
3 Anurag Hota
3 Arnav Anand
3 Nick Gorgone
3 Rashmi
3 sandeepkrjha
3 sashank27
2 Arfon Smith
2 Marta
2 Max M
2 Saurav Sachidanand
2 luzpaz
1 Meg Davis
1 Ricardo Valles Blanco
1 Ricardo Vallés Blanco
1 Sambhav Kothari
1 Shriharsh Tendulkar
1 Terrence Wong
1 Your Name
1 ajitjjadhav
1 dependabot[bot]
1 dhuppenkothen
1 francescodoan
1 paopaofi
1 parulsethi
1 pupper emeritus
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1205
🔴 Failed to discover a Statement of need
section in paper
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf. Problem with affiliations for John Swinbank, perhaps the affiliations index need quoting?.
Hi @matteobachetti, and thanks for your submission. I noticed that this submission is for Stingray v2 and Stingray v1 was previously published as a joint publication with AAS Journals. Is this submission also a joint submission with AAS Journals?
Also, for the sake of whichever editor and reviewers handle this, are there specific parts of the package that are new and warrant review, or has enough changed that it's worth treating this as a fresh review anyway?
I think the error in the paper is that John Swinbank has affiliation number 4 but no such affiliation is given. (The list skips from 3 to 5.)
Note also that we require a statement of need, and that the paper is currently a bit longer than our stated maximum of 1000 words (though not by much). If you could squeeze it down, that'll be great.
Our editors are all operating at capacity so I'm going to waitlist this submission but hopefully one will be available by the time you've addressed these initial points.
@warrickball thanks! First of all, let me apologize for not specifying that the paper already went through pyOpenSci review here: https://github.com/pyOpenSci/software-submission/issues/201 (at pyOpenSci the editors told us not to forget this, but of course I did).
There is no publication with AAS planned for now, this paper was really meant to give an update on the work we've been doing on the code since 2019, in connection with the pyOpenSci review.
@matteobachetti – it would be useful to have an explicit diff here that clearly demonstrates the code changes between v1 and v2 of this library.
@warrickball – assuming the scale/scope of the changes between v1 and v2 meet out 'substantial scholarly effort' criterion, we can proceed here without additional review (see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/editing.html#ropensci-reviewed-or-pyopensci-reviewed-and-accepted-submissions)
@arfon, the first paper was in 2019, so basically everything you see in this changelog from 2020 on (from v.0.2 on!) was not in the first paper: https://docs.stingray.science/en/stable/history.html
In any case, thanks for the feedback! If you agree that the changes in the code are sufficient to justify a new paper, I can start working on the issues raised above from Tuesday on (upcoming proposal deadline! 😅)
@editorialbot commands
Hello @matteobachetti, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch
# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
@editorialbot check repository @editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.31 s (438.4 files/s, 202773.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 89 9711 15953 26967
reStructuredText 22 585 385 1244
Markdown 6 92 0 379
Jupyter Notebook 1 0 5087 371
SVG 1 1 1 364
TeX 2 27 0 363
YAML 9 37 45 361
DOS Batch 1 21 1 148
make 1 22 5 107
INI 1 15 0 86
TOML 1 11 0 42
CSS 1 1 0 6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 135 10523 21477 30438
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
1743 Matteo Bachetti
447 Daniela Huppenkothen
127 Himanshu Mishra
103 mbachett
84 John Swinbank
78 Swapnil Sharma
68 Usman Mahmood
65 Haroon Rashid
63 Abbie Stevens
60 Usman
58 Amogh Desai
48 Gaurav17Joshi
43 Mihir Tripathi
33 Gullo
32 Abigail Stevens
26 Evandro M. Ribeiro
26 pupperemeritus
22 Brigitta Sipocz
19 Evandro M Ribeiro
17 Dhruv Vats
14 Guglielmo Mastroserio
12 tappina
8 omargamal8
7 Megan Davis
7 Stuart Mumford
6 Mihir
6 devanshshukla99
5 Abhinav Kumar
5 Achilles Rasquinha
5 Brigitta Sipőcz
5 Riccardo Campana
5 Tomasz Kolek
5 _youteakay
5 parkma99
4 Evandro Martinez Ribeiro
4 Nitish Garg
4 da-ta-vinci21
3 Anurag Hota
3 Arnav Anand
3 Nick Gorgone
3 Rashmi
3 sandeepkrjha
3 sashank27
2 Arfon Smith
2 Marta
2 Max M
2 Saurav Sachidanand
2 luzpaz
1 Meg Davis
1 Ricardo Valles Blanco
1 Ricardo Vallés Blanco
1 Sambhav Kothari
1 Shriharsh Tendulkar
1 Terrence Wong
1 Your Name
1 ajitjjadhav
1 dependabot[bot]
1 dhuppenkothen
1 francescodoan
1 paopaofi
1 parulsethi
1 pupper emeritus
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1258
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
@editorialbot check repository
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.32 s (428.3 files/s, 198066.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 89 9711 15953 26967
reStructuredText 22 585 385 1244
Markdown 6 92 0 373
Jupyter Notebook 1 0 5087 371
SVG 1 1 1 364
TeX 2 27 0 363
YAML 9 37 45 361
DOS Batch 1 21 1 148
make 1 22 5 107
INI 1 15 0 86
TOML 1 11 0 42
CSS 1 1 0 6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 135 10523 21477 30432
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
1744 Matteo Bachetti
447 Daniela Huppenkothen
127 Himanshu Mishra
103 mbachett
84 John Swinbank
78 Swapnil Sharma
68 Usman Mahmood
65 Haroon Rashid
63 Abbie Stevens
60 Usman
58 Amogh Desai
48 Gaurav17Joshi
43 Mihir Tripathi
33 Gullo
32 Abigail Stevens
26 Evandro M. Ribeiro
26 pupperemeritus
22 Brigitta Sipocz
19 Evandro M Ribeiro
17 Dhruv Vats
14 Guglielmo Mastroserio
12 tappina
8 omargamal8
7 Megan Davis
7 Stuart Mumford
6 Mihir
6 devanshshukla99
5 Abhinav Kumar
5 Achilles Rasquinha
5 Brigitta Sipőcz
5 Riccardo Campana
5 Tomasz Kolek
5 _youteakay
5 parkma99
4 Evandro Martinez Ribeiro
4 Nitish Garg
4 da-ta-vinci21
3 Anurag Hota
3 Arnav Anand
3 Nick Gorgone
3 Rashmi
3 sandeepkrjha
3 sashank27
2 Arfon Smith
2 Marta
2 Max M
2 Saurav Sachidanand
2 luzpaz
1 Meg Davis
1 Ricardo Valles Blanco
1 Ricardo Vallés Blanco
1 Sambhav Kothari
1 Shriharsh Tendulkar
1 Terrence Wong
1 Your Name
1 ajitjjadhav
1 dependabot[bot]
1 dhuppenkothen
1 francescodoan
1 paopaofi
1 parulsethi
1 pupper emeritus
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1156
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
@editorialbot check repository
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.31 s (430.4 files/s, 199019.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 89 9711 15953 26967
reStructuredText 22 585 385 1244
Jupyter Notebook 1 0 5087 371
Markdown 6 93 0 371
SVG 1 1 1 364
TeX 2 27 0 363
YAML 9 37 45 361
DOS Batch 1 21 1 148
make 1 22 5 107
INI 1 15 0 86
TOML 1 11 0 42
CSS 1 1 0 6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 135 10524 21477 30430
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
1745 Matteo Bachetti
447 Daniela Huppenkothen
127 Himanshu Mishra
103 mbachett
84 John Swinbank
78 Swapnil Sharma
68 Usman Mahmood
65 Haroon Rashid
63 Abbie Stevens
60 Usman
58 Amogh Desai
48 Gaurav17Joshi
43 Mihir Tripathi
33 Gullo
32 Abigail Stevens
26 Evandro M. Ribeiro
26 pupperemeritus
22 Brigitta Sipocz
19 Evandro M Ribeiro
17 Dhruv Vats
14 Guglielmo Mastroserio
12 tappina
8 omargamal8
7 Megan Davis
7 Stuart Mumford
6 Mihir
6 devanshshukla99
5 Abhinav Kumar
5 Achilles Rasquinha
5 Brigitta Sipőcz
5 Riccardo Campana
5 Tomasz Kolek
5 _youteakay
5 parkma99
4 Evandro Martinez Ribeiro
4 Nitish Garg
4 da-ta-vinci21
3 Anurag Hota
3 Arnav Anand
3 Nick Gorgone
3 Rashmi
3 sandeepkrjha
3 sashank27
2 Arfon Smith
2 Marta
2 Max M
2 Saurav Sachidanand
2 luzpaz
1 Meg Davis
1 Ricardo Valles Blanco
1 Ricardo Vallés Blanco
1 Sambhav Kothari
1 Shriharsh Tendulkar
1 Terrence Wong
1 Your Name
1 ajitjjadhav
1 dependabot[bot]
1 dhuppenkothen
1 francescodoan
1 paopaofi
1 parulsethi
1 pupper emeritus
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1108
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
@editorialbot check repository
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.32 s (423.5 files/s, 195854.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 89 9711 15953 26967
reStructuredText 22 585 385 1244
Markdown 6 95 0 373
Jupyter Notebook 1 0 5087 371
SVG 1 1 1 364
TeX 2 27 0 363
YAML 9 37 45 361
DOS Batch 1 21 1 148
make 1 22 5 107
INI 1 15 0 86
TOML 1 11 0 42
CSS 1 1 0 6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 135 10526 21477 30432
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
1747 Matteo Bachetti
447 Daniela Huppenkothen
127 Himanshu Mishra
103 mbachett
84 John Swinbank
78 Swapnil Sharma
68 Usman Mahmood
65 Haroon Rashid
63 Abbie Stevens
60 Usman
58 Amogh Desai
48 Gaurav17Joshi
43 Mihir Tripathi
33 Gullo
32 Abigail Stevens
26 Evandro M. Ribeiro
26 pupperemeritus
22 Brigitta Sipocz
19 Evandro M Ribeiro
17 Dhruv Vats
14 Guglielmo Mastroserio
12 tappina
8 omargamal8
7 Megan Davis
7 Stuart Mumford
6 Mihir
6 devanshshukla99
5 Abhinav Kumar
5 Achilles Rasquinha
5 Brigitta Sipőcz
5 Riccardo Campana
5 Tomasz Kolek
5 _youteakay
5 parkma99
4 Evandro Martinez Ribeiro
4 Nitish Garg
4 da-ta-vinci21
3 Anurag Hota
3 Arnav Anand
3 Nick Gorgone
3 Rashmi
3 sandeepkrjha
3 sashank27
2 Arfon Smith
2 Marta
2 Max M
2 Saurav Sachidanand
2 luzpaz
1 Meg Davis
1 Ricardo Valles Blanco
1 Ricardo Vallés Blanco
1 Sambhav Kothari
1 Shriharsh Tendulkar
1 Terrence Wong
1 Your Name
1 ajitjjadhav
1 dependabot[bot]
1 dhuppenkothen
1 francescodoan
1 paopaofi
1 parulsethi
1 pupper emeritus
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1042
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.
@warrickball I still have a few words to cut (and if you ask how many, it's 42, Douglas Adams would be proud). However, I get an error from the pdf generation which I don't understand:
/opt/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.3.4/x64/lib/ruby/3.3.0/psych/parser.rb:62:in `_native_parse': (tmp/89fbb0b4faffadd5c23d73ca35df12df/joss/paper.md): did not find expected key while parsing a block mapping at line 2 column 1 (Psych::SyntaxError)
from /opt/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.3.4/x64/lib/ruby/3.3.0/psych/parser.rb:62:in `parse'
from /opt/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.3.4/x64/lib/ruby/3.3.0/psych.rb:455:in `parse_stream'
from /opt/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.3.4/x64/lib/ruby/3.3.0/psych.rb:399:in `parse'
from /opt/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.3.4/x64/lib/ruby/3.3.0/psych.rb:323:in `safe_load'
from /opt/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.3.4/x64/lib/ruby/3.3.0/psych.rb:369:in `load'
from /opt/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.3.4/x64/lib/ruby/3.3.0/psych.rb:671:in `block in load_file'
from /opt/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.3.4/x64/lib/ruby/3.3.0/psych.rb:670:in `open'
from /opt/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.3.4/x64/lib/ruby/3.3.0/psych.rb:670:in `load_file'
from /home/runner/work/_actions/xuanxu/paper-action/main/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/theoj-1.10.0/lib/theoj/paper.rb:113:in `load_metadata'
from /home/runner/work/_actions/xuanxu/paper-action/main/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/theoj-1.10.0/lib/theoj/paper.rb:20:in `initialize'
from /home/runner/work/_actions/xuanxu/paper-action/main/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/theoj-1.10.0/lib/theoj/paper.rb:82:in `new'
from /home/runner/work/_actions/xuanxu/paper-action/main/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/theoj-1.10.0/lib/theoj/paper.rb:82:in `from_repo'
from /home/runner/work/_actions/xuanxu/paper-action/main/get_paper.rb:12:in `<main>'
Error: Process completed with exit code 1.
I don't understand what key it is missing in line 2 column 1 🤔
Thanks for cutting it down! I'm willing to let 1042 words through and will see if I can reproduce the PDF generation error.
It looks to me like this commit nudged the indentation of the index
field for each affiliation by removing one leading space. I couldn't build the paper as it is but aligning them with the name
line above again got the paper to build for me.
Ouch. Done!
@editorialbot generate pdf
:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
Astronomical échelle spectroscopy data analysis with muler
Submitting author: @gully
Handling editor: @xuanxu (Active)
Reviewers: @bmorris3, @wtgee
Similarity score: 0.7696
X-PSI: A Python package for neutron star X-ray pulse simulation and inference
Submitting author: @drannawatts
Handling editor: @adonath (Active)
Reviewers: @JohannesBuchner, @matteobachetti
Similarity score: 0.7477
DBSP_DRP: A Python package for automated spectroscopic data reduction of DBSP data
Submitting author: @finagle29
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @crhea93, @arjunsavel
Similarity score: 0.7473
The Pulsar Signal Simulator: A Python package for simulating radio signal data from pulsars
Submitting author: @Hazboun6
Handling editor: @mbobra (Active)
Reviewers: @JBorrow, @arjunsavel
Similarity score: 0.7451
SNEWPY: A Data Pipeline from Supernova Simulations to Neutrino Signals
Submitting author: @JostMigenda
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @apizzuto, @PeterDenton
Similarity score: 0.7358
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@matteobachetti – it would be useful to have an explicit diff here that clearly demonstrates the code changes between v1 and v2 of this library.
@warrickball – assuming the scale/scope of the changes between v1 and v2 meet out 'substantial scholarly effort' criterion, we can proceed here without additional review (see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/editing.html#ropensci-reviewed-or-pyopensci-reviewed-and-accepted-submissions)
$ git diff --stat v0.2 v2.0.0 stingray/*.py
stingray/__init__.py | 7 +
stingray/_astropy_init.py | 35 +--
stingray/base.py | 2828 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
stingray/bexvar.py | 275 ++++++++++++++++++++
stingray/bispectrum.py | 105 ++++----
stingray/conftest.py | 34 +--
stingray/covariancespectrum.py | 170 ++++++------
stingray/crosscorrelation.py | 175 +++++++++----
stingray/crossspectrum.py | 3031 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------------------------------
stingray/events.py | 816 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
stingray/filters.py | 54 ++--
stingray/fourier.py | 2474 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
stingray/gti.py | 1186 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
stingray/io.py | 1393 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------------------
stingray/lightcurve.py | 1446 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------------------
stingray/loggingconfig.py | 39 +++
stingray/lombscargle.py | 686 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
stingray/multitaper.py | 791 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
stingray/power_colors.py | 495 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
stingray/powerspectrum.py | 1570 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
stingray/sampledata.py | 13 +-
stingray/spectroscopy.py | 57 ++---
stingray/stats.py | 833 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
stingray/utils.py | 1681 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
stingray/varenergyspectrum.py | 964 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
25 files changed, 17514 insertions(+), 3644 deletions(-)
@arfon — This isn't necessarily super accurate but I couldn't get cloc
to parse a diff
. From the code alone it looks like plenty of functionality was implemented since the first Stingray JOSS paper.
@matteobachetti — I intend to take a closer look at this soon but at a quick glance I noticed a few references aren't rendering. Specifically, note all the lingering square brackets in this sentence:
Methods include Gaussian Process modeling of quasi-periodic oscillations [hubner] and Lomb-Scargle cross spectra [scargle]. We have introduced the Fourier-Domain Acceleration Search [ransom], the H-test [dejager] and Phase Dispersion Minimization [stellingwerf] statistics into the pulsar sub package.
I also don't see the JOSS reference to the original Stingray publication (Huppenkothen et al. 2019b) actually turn up in the text. The associated ApJ reference (Huppenkothen et al. 2019a) is in the summary.
Another few quick fixes while we're at it:
Don't worry too much about the typographic stuff. I can open a pull request to fix any minor things (like the last point) but it'll be more difficult for me to guess missing data, like exactly what you meant to cite in that sentence about methods that I quoted above.
@warrickball sorry, I had gotten the syntax for citations wrong in various creative ways 😅 . Now all should appear correctly
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
Astronomical échelle spectroscopy data analysis with muler
Submitting author: @gully
Handling editor: @xuanxu (Active)
Reviewers: @bmorris3, @wtgee
Similarity score: 0.8103
DBSP_DRP: A Python package for automated spectroscopic data reduction of DBSP data
Submitting author: @finagle29
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @crhea93, @arjunsavel
Similarity score: 0.7958
SkyPy: A package for modelling the Universe
Submitting author: @rrjbca
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @cescalara, @rmorgan10
Similarity score: 0.7880
The Python Sky Model 3 software
Submitting author: @zonca
Handling editor: @christinahedges (Retired)
Reviewers: @patricialarsen, @smsharma
Similarity score: 0.7782
SNEWPY: A Data Pipeline from Supernova Simulations to Neutrino Signals
Submitting author: @JostMigenda
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @apizzuto, @PeterDenton
Similarity score: 0.7761
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
Astronomical échelle spectroscopy data analysis with muler
Submitting author: @gully
Handling editor: @xuanxu (Active)
Reviewers: @bmorris3, @wtgee
Similarity score: 0.8094
DBSP_DRP: A Python package for automated spectroscopic data reduction of DBSP data
Submitting author: @finagle29
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @crhea93, @arjunsavel
Similarity score: 0.7970
SkyPy: A package for modelling the Universe
Submitting author: @rrjbca
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @cescalara, @rmorgan10
Similarity score: 0.7813
SNEWPY: A Data Pipeline from Supernova Simulations to Neutrino Signals
Submitting author: @JostMigenda
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @apizzuto, @PeterDenton
Similarity score: 0.7793
The Python Sky Model 3 software
Submitting author: @zonca
Handling editor: @christinahedges (Retired)
Reviewers: @patricialarsen, @smsharma
Similarity score: 0.7739
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@editorialbot assign me as editor
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@matteobachetti<!--end-author-handle-- (Matteo Bachetti) Repository: https://github.com/stingraysoftware/stingray Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): update_joss_paper Version: 2.1 Editor: !--editor-->@warrickball<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: !--reviewers-list-->@warrickball<!--end-reviewers-list-- Managing EiC: Warrick Ball
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @matteobachetti. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@matteobachetti if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: