Open editorialbot opened 2 days ago
editorialbot
commented
2 days ago Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commandsFor example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdfSoftware report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.05 s (1510.4 files/s, 157635.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 45 1100 1853 2572
SVG 1 0 0 729
TeX 2 50 0 502
reStructuredText 14 187 144 207
YAML 5 28 11 123
Markdown 2 18 0 72
HTML 2 6 1 48
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
TOML 1 1 0 16
make 1 4 7 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 74 1402 2017 4304
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Commit count by author:
144 EtienneCmb
66 Dishie2498
10 Pierre Robiglio
9 Mattehub
7 Onur Ates
7 dependabot[bot]
3 Matteo NERI
2 Andrea Brovelli
1 Christian Ferreyra
1 Etienne CombrissonPaper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 781
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section
editorialbot
commented
2 days ago Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.100.032305 is OK
- 10.1038/s41593-022-01070-0 is OK
- 10.3390/e21090869 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.013025 is OK
- 10.1038/s41567-021-01371-4 is OK
- 10.1523/ENEURO.0052-18.2018 is OK
- 10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105918 is OK
- 10.1089/brain.2020.0982 is OK
- 10.7554/eLife.92938 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01081 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00738 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01609 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006343 is OK
- 10.1016/j.tics.2023.11.005 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.013025 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.052802 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Towards an extended taxonomy of information dynami...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Nonnegative decomposition of multivariate informat...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Beyond normal: On the evaluation of mutual informa...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: An information-theoretic approach to hypergraph ps...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Estimation of Shannon differential entropy: An ext...
❌ MISSING DOIs
- 10.4135/9781412959384.n229 may be a valid DOI for title: A mathematical theory of communication
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
License info:
✅ License found: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)
editorialbot
commented
2 days ago :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
jbytecode
commented
2 days ago Dear @pitmonticone, @ClaudMor
You can start by creating your task lists. Each list will contain several tasks.
As you complete each task, you can check off the corresponding checkbox. Since the review process for JOSS is interactive, you are encouraged to engage with the author, other reviewers, and the editor throughout. You can open issues and submit pull requests in the target repository. Please include the URL of this page in those interactions, so we can keep track of activities outside of the platform.
To generate your task list, simply type:
@editorialbot generate my checklist
Thank you in advance.
pitmonticone
commented
2 days ago pitmonticone
commented
2 days ago @editorialbot commands
editorialbot
commented
2 days ago Hello @pitmonticone, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch
# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@EtienneCmb<!--end-author-handle-- (Etienne Combrisson) Repository: https://github.com/brainets/hoi Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper Version: v0.0.1 Editor: !--editor-->@jbytecode<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @pitmonticone, @ClaudMor Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@pitmonticone & @ClaudMor, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @jbytecode know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
📝 Checklist for @pitmonticone