[PRE REVIEW]: inu: Inertial Navigation Utilities

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@davidwoodburn<!--end-author-handle-- (David Woodburn) Repository: https://gitlab.com/davidwoodburn/inu Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main Version: 1.1.4 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c1ade8b7992d6c9bc0ba1edda7c281da"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c1ade8b7992d6c9bc0ba1edda7c281da/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c1ade8b7992d6c9bc0ba1edda7c281da/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c1ade8b7992d6c9bc0ba1edda7c281da)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @davidwoodburn. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@davidwoodburn if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1049/pbra017e is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: inu
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Principles of GNSS, Inertial, and Multisensor Inte...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.02 s (633.4 files/s, 119717.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           4            308            695            746
Markdown                         3             73              0            229
TeX                              1              0              0             22
SVG                              3              0              0              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            11            381            695           1003
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    41  David Woodburn

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 282

🔴 Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

[editorialbot]

License info:

🔴 Failed to discover a valid open source license

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Manif: A micro Lie theory library for state estimation in robotics applications Submitting author: @artivis Handling editor: @poulson (Retired) Reviewers: @jordigh, @drvinceknight, @alex-konovalov Similarity score: 0.5562

CoreRobotics: An object-oriented C++ library with cross-language wrappers for cross-platform robot control Submitting author: @CoreRobotics Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active) Reviewers: @bmagyar @amjaeger17 Similarity score: 0.5446

PyMap3D: 3-D coordinate conversions for terrestrial and geospace environments Submitting author: @scivision Handling editor: @lheagy (Retired) Reviewers: @hugoledoux Similarity score: 0.5375

Qlunc: Quantification of lidar uncertainty Submitting author: @PacoCosta Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active) Reviewers: @adi3, @antviro Similarity score: 0.5355

SimuPy Flight Vehicle Toolkit Submitting author: @ixjlyons Handling editor: @prashjha (Active) Reviewers: @athulpg007, @aliaksei135 Similarity score: 0.5278

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[kyleniemeyer]

Hi @davidwoodburn, due to the relatively small size of your software package, the JOSS editorial board is going to take a closer look to see if it meets our standards for substantial scholarly effort. We'll get back to you within a week or two.

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot query scope

[editorialbot]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[kyleniemeyer]

@davidwoodburn Unfortunately, upon review, the JOSS editorial board has found that your submission is too small to meet our standards for substantial scholarly effort. Please consider other venues for archiving your software and receiving a citeable DOI, such as Zenodo, or pyOpenSci.

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot reject

[editorialbot]

Paper rejected.

[davidwoodburn]

@kyleniemeyer, sorry to bother you after the issue has been closed. Can you give me an idea of how large the project should be before I try submitting again?

[kyleniemeyer]

@davidwoodburn we automatically flag submissions that are under 1000 source lines of code (meaning not comments), but just being strictly above that number does not guarantee a submission will meet the criteria since that is just a general guideline.

[davidwoodburn]

Ah, I see. Thank you for the answer.