Open editorialbot opened 2 days ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.11 s (936.2 files/s, 441612.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG 1 0 39 4938
Python 48 1126 1769 4167
C++ 3 223 84 994
Jupyter Notebook 14 0 31826 869
CSV 12 0 0 772
TeX 1 41 0 462
R 2 40 205 119
Markdown 3 49 0 95
reStructuredText 13 34 70 49
YAML 2 6 8 46
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
TOML 1 10 0 19
make 1 4 7 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 102 1541 34009 12565
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
284 David O'Gara
9 Mickaël Binois
1 Lia Schattner
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1056
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
🟡 License found: GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1
(Check here for OSI approval)
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009149 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v098.i13 is OK
- 10.1002/adts.202300147 is OK
- 10.1098/rsos.210506 is OK
- 10.1126/science.abm4247 is OK
- 10.1080/10618600.2018.1458625 is OK
- 10.1080/00401706.2018.1469433 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2002.01321 is OK
- 10.1016/j.epidem.2021.100535 is OK
- 10.1038/s41467-021-27486-z is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1912.01703 is OK
- 10.1145/2049662.2049669 is OK
- 10.1002/9780470770801 is OK
- 10.1007/s00158-013-0919-4 is OK
- 10.7717/peerj-cs.1516 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.04455 is OK
- 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1985.tb01327.x is OK
- 10.1287/opre.1090.0754 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.1137/0916069 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Bayesian Optimization
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Surrogates: Gaussian Process Modeling, Design and ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Modeling and Simulation in Python: An Introduction...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
- No DOI given, and none found for title: BoTorch: A Framework for Efficient Monte-Carlo Bay...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Virtual Library of Simulation Experiments: Test Fu...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: GPflow: A Gaussian Process Library using TensorFlo...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: reticulate: Interface to ’Python’
❌ MISSING DOIs
- 10.1201/9781003226581 may be a valid DOI for title: Modeling and Simulation in Python
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
PyKronecker: A Python Library for the Efficient Manipulation of Kronecker Products and Related Structures
Submitting author: @nickelnine37
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @JulianKarlBauer, @nicoguaro
Similarity score: 0.6849
Re-Envisioning Numerical Information Field Theory (NIFTy.re): A Library for Gaussian Processes and Variational Inference
Submitting author: @Edenhofer
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @Abinashbunty, @apizzuto
Similarity score: 0.6845
parafields: A generator for distributed, stationary Gaussian processes
Submitting author: @dokempf
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @shahmoradi, @gchure
Similarity score: 0.6838
swift-emulator: A Python package for emulation of simulated scaling relations
Submitting author: @Moyoxkit
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @JDonaldM, @kstoreyf
Similarity score: 0.6834
PyVBMC: Efficient Bayesian inference in Python
Submitting author: @Bobby-Huggins
Handling editor: @rkurchin (Active)
Reviewers: @matt-graham, @isdanni
Similarity score: 0.6794
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@davidogara<!--end-author-handle-- (David O’Gara) Repository: https://github.com/davidogara/hetGPy Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.1 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Chris Vernon
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @davidogara. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@davidogara if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: