Open editorialbot opened 2 days ago
Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.04 s (848.2 files/s, 167706.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 10 752 1092 1360
Jupyter Notebook 13 0 2865 662
TeX 1 19 0 208
Markdown 4 25 0 88
YAML 3 9 9 61
reStructuredText 3 21 34 28
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
TOML 1 4 0 24
make 1 4 7 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 37 842 4008 2466
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
66 Jaren Ashcraft
24 Jashcraf
9 kenjim21
7 Work
3 wcmelby
2 Rebecca Zhang
1 becca9808
Paper file info:
π Wordcount for paper.md
is 614
β
The paper includes a Statement of need
section
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
β
OK DOIs
- 10.1364/OL.2.000148 is OK
- 10.1364/AO.41.002488 is OK
- 10.1117/12.2525377 is OK
- 10.1364/JOSAA.13.001106 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.1117/12.2678001 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01352 is OK
- 10.1364/JOSAA.472364 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.02693 is OK
π‘ SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Polarized Light and Optical Systems
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Polarization aberrations in next-generation giant ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Habitable Exoplanet Observatory (HabEx) Missio...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: CuPy: A NumPy-Compatible Library for NVIDIA GPU Ca...
- No DOI given, and none found for title:
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Gromit: Repository containing code to use the UASA...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy pr...
β MISSING DOIs
- 10.1117/12.3019204 may be a valid DOI for title: The space coronagraph optical bench (SCoOB): 3. Mu...
- 10.1117/12.3019556 may be a valid DOI for title: Half-wave plate characterizations for the Keck NIR...
β INVALID DOIs
- https://zenodo.org/badge/latestdoi/128805296 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
License info:
β
License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
@benjaminpope, @arendMoerman β This is the review thread for the paper. All of our correspondence will happen here from now on. Thanks again for agreeing to participate!
π Please read the "Reviewer instructions & questions" in the first comment above, and generate your checklists by commenting @editorialbot generate my checklist
on this issue ASAP. As you go over the submission, please check any items that you feel have been satisfied. There are also links to the JOSS reviewer guidelines.
The JOSS review is different from most other journals. Our goal is to work with the authors to help them meet our criteria instead of merely passing judgment on the submission. As such, the reviewers are encouraged to submit issues and pull requests on the software repository. When doing so, please mention openjournals/joss-reviews#7375
so that a link is created to this thread (and I can keep an eye on what is happening). Please also feel free to comment and ask questions on this thread. In my experience, it is better to post comments/questions/suggestions as you come across them instead of waiting until you've reviewed the entire package.
We aim for the review process to be completed within about 4-6 weeks but please try to make a start ahead of this as JOSS reviews are by their nature iterative and any early feedback you may be able to provide to the author will be very helpful in meeting this schedule. Please get your review started as soon as possible!
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@Jashcraf β In the meantime, please start by checking the DOI suggestions from @editorialbot above βοΈ
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@Jashcraf<!--end-author-handle-- (Jaren Ashcraft) Repository: https://github.com/Jashcraf/katsu Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@dfm<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @benjaminpope, @arendMoerman Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@benjaminpope & @arendMoerman, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @dfm know.
β¨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest β¨
Checklists
π Checklist for @arendMoerman