Open editorialbot opened 2 days ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.20 s (502.3 files/s, 49574.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 21 739 770 2257
JSON 53 0 0 774
HTML 1 4 1 443
XML 1 0 0 342
Markdown 5 111 0 325
reStructuredText 7 184 206 155
Jupyter Notebook 2 0 2941 126
TeX 1 9 0 114
Bourne Shell 1 8 2 85
make 2 22 7 69
TOML 2 9 1 64
YAML 2 9 13 43
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
CSV 1 0 0 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 100 1103 3942 4825
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
107 samuelmurail
15 Samuel Murail
1 Alaa REGUEI
1 regueiala
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
β
OK DOIs
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 is OK
- 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad573 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad424 is OK
- 10.1101/2024.02.19.580970 is OK
- 10.1101/2024.02.19.580970 is OK
π‘ SKIP DOIs
- None
β MISSING DOIs
- 10.1101/2021.08.15.456425 may be a valid DOI for title: ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to al...
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0161879 may be a valid DOI for title: DockQ: a quality measure for protein-protein docki...
- 10.1038/s41467-022-28865-w may be a valid DOI for title: Improved prediction of protein-protein interaction...
β INVALID DOIs
- None
Paper file info:
π Wordcount for paper.md
is 465
β
The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
π‘ License found: GNU General Public License v2.0
(Check here for OSI approval)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
Project RACCOON: Automated construction of PDB files for polymers and polymer peptide conjugates
Submitting author: @moritzobenauer
Handling editor: @jromanowska (Active)
Reviewers: @taoliu032, @lorenzo-rovigatti
Similarity score: 0.7172
SolvationAnalysis: A Python toolkit for understanding liquid solvation structure in classical molecular dynamics simulations
Submitting author: @orionarcher
Handling editor: @zhubonan (Active)
Reviewers: @amritagos, @arose
Similarity score: 0.7043
MembraneAnalysis.jl: A Julia package for analyzing molecular dynamics simulations of lipid membranes
Submitting author: @amiralih
Handling editor: @majensen (Active)
Reviewers: @tonigi, @davidnsousa
Similarity score: 0.6937
dfba: Software for efficient simulation of dynamic flux-balance analysis models in Python
Submitting author: @davidtourigny
Handling editor: @marcosvital (Active)
Reviewers: @jdbrunner, @pstjohn, @synchon
Similarity score: 0.6916
DeepOF: a Python package for supervised and unsupervised pattern recognition in mice motion tracking data
Submitting author: @lucasmiranda42
Handling editor: @emdupre (Active)
Reviewers: @cellistigs, @edeno
Similarity score: 0.6914
β οΈ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@editorialbot commands
Hello @samuelmurail, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch
# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
dms2dfe: Comprehensive Workflow for Analysis of Deep Mutational Scanning Data
Submitting author: @rraadd88
Handling editor: @tracykteal (Retired)
Reviewers: @afrubin
Similarity score: 0.7176
SolvationAnalysis: A Python toolkit for understanding liquid solvation structure in classical molecular dynamics simulations
Submitting author: @orionarcher
Handling editor: @zhubonan (Active)
Reviewers: @amritagos, @arose
Similarity score: 0.7024
MembraneAnalysis.jl: A Julia package for analyzing molecular dynamics simulations of lipid membranes
Submitting author: @amiralih
Handling editor: @majensen (Active)
Reviewers: @tonigi, @davidnsousa
Similarity score: 0.6898
DeepOF: a Python package for supervised and unsupervised pattern recognition in mice motion tracking data
Submitting author: @lucasmiranda42
Handling editor: @emdupre (Active)
Reviewers: @cellistigs, @edeno
Similarity score: 0.6891
dfba: Software for efficient simulation of dynamic flux-balance analysis models in Python
Submitting author: @davidtourigny
Handling editor: @marcosvital (Active)
Reviewers: @jdbrunner, @pstjohn, @synchon
Similarity score: 0.6882
β οΈ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
β
OK DOIs
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 is OK
- 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad573 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad424 is OK
- 10.1101/2024.02.19.580970 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0161879 is OK
- 10.1101/2024.02.19.580970 is OK
- 10.1038/s41467-022-28865-w is OK
π‘ SKIP DOIs
- None
β MISSING DOIs
- None
β INVALID DOIs
- None
Here is a list of potential reviewers, which should have some knowledge about protein/DNA/RNA structure and Alphafold.
@editorialbot check repository
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.20 s (496.5 files/s, 52204.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 21 727 770 2900
JSON 53 0 0 774
HTML 1 4 1 443
XML 1 0 0 344
Markdown 5 111 0 324
reStructuredText 7 184 206 155
Jupyter Notebook 2 0 2941 126
TeX 1 9 0 117
Bourne Shell 1 8 2 85
TOML 2 11 1 72
make 2 22 7 68
YAML 2 9 13 43
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
CSV 1 0 0 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 100 1093 3942 5479
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
114 samuelmurail
15 Samuel Murail
1 Alaa REGUEI
1 regueiala
Paper file info:
π Wordcount for paper.md
is 465
β
The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
π‘ License found: GNU General Public License v2.0
(Check here for OSI approval)
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@samuelmurail<!--end-author-handle-- (Samuel Murail) Repository: https://github.com/samuelmurail/af2_analysis Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.0.2 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @samuelmurail. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@samuelmurail if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: