Open editorialbot opened 2 hours ago
editorialbot
commented
2 hours ago Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commandsFor example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdfSoftware report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.03 s (1232.9 files/s, 246032.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R 12 321 1473 1267
XML 1 0 0 1125
CSV 3 0 0 824
Markdown 5 105 0 331
Rmd 3 190 239 255
YAML 5 25 7 112
TeX 1 9 0 101
SVG 2 0 0 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 32 650 1719 4017
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Commit count by author:
69 Sam El-Kamand
36 Sam
29 selkamand
19 unknownReference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.1002/imt2.43 is OK
- 10.1101/gr.239244.118 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw325 is OK
- 10.32614/CRAN.package.ggiraph is OK
- 10.32614/cran.package.patchwork is OK
- 10.32614/CRAN.package.ggplot2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41587-020-0546-8 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cels.2018.03.002 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- None
❌ MISSING DOIs
- None
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 932
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section
editorialbot
commented
2 hours ago License info:
🟡 License found: Other (Check here for OSI approval)
editorialbot
commented
2 hours ago :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@selkamand<!--end-author-handle-- (Sam El-Kamand) Repository: https://github.com/selkamand/ggoncoplot Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@ppxasjsm<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: !--reviewers-list-->@zainabarshad<!--end-reviewers-list-- Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@zainabarshad, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @ppxasjsm know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
@zainabarshad, please create your checklist typing:
@editorialbot generate my checklist