openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
721 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: gaia: An R package to estimate crop yield responses to temperature and precipitation #7393

Open editorialbot opened 1 week ago

editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@mengqi-z<!--end-author-handle-- (Mengqi Zhao) Repository: https://github.com/JGCRI/gaia Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main Version: v1.0.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2d9e978a79341311fa3348e68612acdc"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2d9e978a79341311fa3348e68612acdc/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2d9e978a79341311fa3348e68612acdc/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2d9e978a79341311fa3348e68612acdc)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mengqi-z. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@mengqi-z if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 1 week ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1088/1748-9326/abadcb is OK
- 10.1038/ncomms6989 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-12-677-2019 is OK
- 10.4236/as.2015.69105 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-10-1403-2017 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.1312330110 is OK
- 10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034003 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: GCAM Documentation

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003435 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108448 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00551.x is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12086 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.02 s (1254.9 files/s, 230327.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               17            839           1241           2709
YAML                             6             35              5            184
Markdown                         6             76              0            183
TeX                              1             12              0            156
Rmd                              1             72            117             61
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            31           1034           1363           3293
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    41  Mengqi Zhao
editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1338

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 1 week ago

License info:

🟡 License found: Other (Check here for OSI approval)

editorialbot commented 1 week ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

gcamfaostat: An R package to prepare, process, and synthesize FAOSTAT data for global agroeconomic and multisector dynamic modeling Submitting author: @realxinzhao Handling editor: @hugoledoux (Active) Reviewers: @klau506, @HenriKajasilta Similarity score: 0.7549

rfasst: An R tool to estimate air pollution impacts on health and agriculture Submitting author: @jonsampedro Handling editor: @dhhagan (Retired) Reviewers: @nanhung, @ibarraespinosa Similarity score: 0.7147

gcamreport: An R tool to process and standardize GCAM outputs Submitting author: @klau506 Handling editor: @martinfleis (Active) Reviewers: @bpbond, @ibarraespinosa Similarity score: 0.7119

Geodata-Harvester: A Python package to jumpstart geospatial data extraction and analysis Submitting author: @sebhaan Handling editor: @hugoledoux (Active) Reviewers: @lukasbeuster, @martibosch Similarity score: 0.7052

helios: An R package to process heating and cooling degrees for GCAM Submitting author: @mengqi-z Handling editor: @hugoledoux (Active) Reviewers: @RBhupi, @ibarraespinosa Similarity score: 0.6968

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

kthyng commented 1 week ago

Hi @mengqi-z and thanks for your submission! I am looking for some specific items to make sure your submission fits our requirements at a high level (not at the more detailed review level) before moving on to finding an editor or putting this on our waitlist if no relevant editors are available. I'll comment over time as I have a chance to go through them:

In the meantime, please take a look at the comments above ⬆️ from the editorialbot to address any DOI, license, or paper issues if you're able (there may not be any), or suggest reviewers. For reviewers, please suggest 5 reviewers from the database listed above or your own (non-conflicted) extended network. Their github handles are most useful to receive but please don't use "@" to reference them since it will prematurely ping them.

kthyng commented 1 week ago

@mengqi-z