[PRE REVIEW]: PointClouds.jl: Fast & flexible processing of lidar data

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@mfsch<!--end-author-handle-- (Manuel F. Schmid) Repository: https://github.com/efpl-columbia/PointClouds.jl Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: v0.4.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7885dd3306a23583dcf3963374c0c1cb"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7885dd3306a23583dcf3963374c0c1cb/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7885dd3306a23583dcf3963374c0c1cb/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7885dd3306a23583dcf3963374c0c1cb)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mfsch. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@mfsch if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.04 s (826.9 files/s, 145369.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julia                           21            608            983           3205
Markdown                         8            243              0            773
YAML                             2              4              0             57
TeX                              1              5              0             49
TOML                             2              4              0             46
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            34            864            983           4130
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    68  Manuel F. Schmid

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104680 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.2616780 is OK
- 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112061 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Automated processing of LiDAR data for high-fideli...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Automated processing of LiDAR data for high-fideli...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1800

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

IndividualDisplacements.jl: a Julia package to simulate and study particle displacements within the climate system Submitting author: @gaelforget Handling editor: @kthyng (Active) Reviewers: @milankl, @visr Similarity score: 0.7375

Makie.jl: Flexible high-performance data visualization for Julia Submitting author: @jkrumbiegel Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active) Reviewers: @fverdugo, @gaelforget Similarity score: 0.7330

Pyoints: A Python package for point cloud, voxel and raster processing. Submitting author: @laempy Handling editor: @lheagy (Retired) Reviewers: @kbevers, @scivision Similarity score: 0.7284

Vlasiator.jl: A Julia package for processing Vlasiator data Submitting author: @henry2004y Handling editor: @pdebuyl (Active) Reviewers: @ranocha, @tkoskela Similarity score: 0.7252

GridapDistributed: a massively parallel finite element toolbox in Julia Submitting author: @amartinhuertas Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active) Reviewers: @PetrKryslUCSD, @Leticia-maria, @jedbrown Similarity score: 0.7195

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[kthyng]

Hi @mfsch and thanks for your submission! I am looking for some specific items to make sure your submission fits our requirements at a high level (not at the more detailed review level) before moving on to finding an editor or putting this on our waitlist if no relevant editors are available. I'll comment over time as I have a chance to go through them:

• [x] OSI-approved license
• [x] Installation instructions
• [x] Documentation exists at all
• [x] Tests of some sort
• [ ] Check paper (make sure compiles, read through, check for length 250-1000 words)
• [x] Substantial scholarly effort
• [x] Clear research application

In the meantime, please take a look at the comments above ⬆️ from the editorialbot to address any DOI, license, or paper issues if you're able (there may not be any), or suggest reviewers. For reviewers, please suggest 5 reviewers from the database listed above or your own (non-conflicted) extended network. Their github handles are most useful to receive but please don't use "@" to reference them since it will prematurely ping them.

[kthyng]

@mfsch

• Please reduce to length of your paper to up to about 1000 words. Paper format information here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/paper.html. You can check paper length (and a few other items) with the command @editorialbot check repository though note it needs to be the first item in a comment to run correctly.

[kthyng]

@mfsch Did you see my note above?

[mfsch]

@kthyng: Thanks for your message – we are preparing an abbreviated version of the paper, which we should be able to submit soon along with a list of suggested reviewers.

[kthyng]

@mfsch Ok thank you!