Open editorialbot opened 3 days ago
editorialbot
commented
3 days ago Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commandsFor example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdfReference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.5281/zenodo.5597138 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.5884351 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: RFC 7946: The GeoJSON Format
- No DOI given, and none found for title: International Conference Held at Washington for th...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: SpatioTemporal Asset Catalog (STAC) specification
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Cartopy: a cartographic python library with a Matp...
❌ MISSING DOIs
- None
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.06 s (2089.0 files/s, 208527.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON 79 0 0 8921
Python 13 209 184 991
Markdown 9 197 0 455
YAML 7 8 0 190
reStructuredText 4 108 130 101
TOML 1 9 0 55
TeX 1 5 0 47
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
Bourne Shell 1 3 2 9
make 1 4 7 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 117 551 324 10804
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Commit count by author:
156 Pete Gadomski
57 dependabot[bot]Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 683
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section
editorialbot
commented
3 days ago License info:
✅ License found: Apache License 2.0 (Valid open source OSI approved license)
editorialbot
commented
3 days ago :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
editorialbot
commented
3 days ago Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
GemGIS - Spatial Data Processing for Geomodeling
Submitting author: @AlexanderJuestel
Handling editor: @crvernon (Active)
Reviewers: @omshinde, @kanishkan91
Similarity score: 0.6807
python-ags4: A Python library to read, write, and validate AGS4 geodata files
Submitting author: @asitha-sena
Handling editor: @jedbrown (Active)
Reviewers: @PaulDebus, @banesullivan, @snakesonabrain
Similarity score: 0.6801
lhorizon: geometry and targeting via JPL Horizons
Submitting author: @m-stclair
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @malmans2, @steo85it
Similarity score: 0.6791
sectionproperties: A Python package for the analysis of arbitrary cross-sections using the finite element method
Submitting author: @robbievanleeuwen
Handling editor: @prashjha (Active)
Reviewers: @dbrizard, @pprachas
Similarity score: 0.6756
EarthPy: A Python package that makes it easier to explore and plot raster and vector data using open source Python tools.
Submitting author: @lwasser
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @arfon
Similarity score: 0.6737
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
kthyng
commented
3 days ago Hi @gadomski and thanks for your submission! I am looking for some specific items to make sure your submission fits our requirements at a high level (not at the more detailed review level) before moving on to finding an editor or putting this on our waitlist if no relevant editors are available. I'll comment over time as I have a chance to go through them:
In the meantime, please take a look at the comments above ⬆️ from the editorialbot to address any DOI, license, or paper issues if you're able (there may not be any), or suggest reviewers. For reviewers, please suggest 5 reviewers from the database listed above or your own (non-conflicted) extended network. Their github handles are most useful to receive but please don't use "@" to reference them since it will prematurely ping them.
gadomski
commented
3 days ago Thanks @kthyng! A couple possible reviewers just from a quick search of the database:
Those are kind of just guesses though 🤷🏼
kthyng
commented
1 day ago Please check the capitalization in your references. You can preserve capitalization by placing {} around characters/words in your .bib file.
I just wish your package handled every problem with longitude for every user! 😆
kthyng
commented
1 day ago We have a backlog of submissions so I will add this to our waitlist. Thanks for your patience.
gadomski
commented
1 day ago Please check the capitalization in your references. You can preserve capitalization by placing {} around characters/words in your .bib file.
Should be fixed by https://github.com/gadomski/antimeridian/pull/152, thanks for the catch! TIL.
I just wish your package handled every problem with longitude for every user! 😆
Right?! We do what we can but it's a messy world out there.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@gadomski<!--end-author-handle-- (Peter Gadomski) Repository: https://github.com/gadomski/antimeridian Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.3.9 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @gadomski. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@gadomski if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: