Open editorialbot opened 1 week ago
Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.71 s (1271.2 files/s, 310890.4 lines/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C++ 364 25062 22528 103345
C/C++ Header 348 15669 18459 23230
Markdown 38 1816 0 4135
Bourne Again Shell 120 702 646 1931
m4 7 136 0 772
Bourne Shell 10 128 261 625
TeX 1 15 0 177
YAML 4 20 8 131
XML 2 14 0 125
Fortran 77 1 7 5 52
Dockerfile 4 27 43 39
HLSL 1 0 0 8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 900 43596 41950 134570
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
959 Philip Cardiff
63 Danial Khazaei
16 Iago Lessa de Oliveira
6 philipcardiff
3 Jeff Heylmun
3 wyldckat
2 Saber Mohammadi
2 Zeljko Tukovic
2 iagolessa
2 scottlevie97
1 Cyrille Bonamy
1 Karen FitzGerald
1 Philipp Milovic
1 Sindeev Sergey
1 emadtandis
Paper file info:
π Wordcount for paper.md
is 668
β
The paper includes a Statement of need
section
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
β
OK DOIs
- 10.48550/arXiv.1808.10736 is OK
- 10.1002/nag.2361 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105498 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107178 is OK
- 10.1016/j.apm.2021.09.009 is OK
- 10.1002/nme.7302 is OK
- 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.03.011 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cma.2013.09.008 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.07.004 is OK
- 10.1002/nme.5345 is OK
- 10.21278/TOF.42301 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-319-60846-4_1 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.11.013 is OK
π‘ SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: OpenFOAM.com
- No DOI given, and none found for title: OpenFOAM.org
- No DOI given, and none found for title: foam-extend project
β MISSING DOIs
- None
β INVALID DOIs
- None
License info:
π‘ License found: GNU General Public License v3.0
(Check here for OSI approval)
π @philipcardiff @MakisH @mohd-afeef-badri the actual review will take place in here.
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
FYI @iBatistic @ztukovic
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@philipcardiff<!--end-author-handle-- (Philip Cardiff) Repository: https://github.com/solids4foam/solids4foam Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: v2.1 Editor: !--editor-->@kyleniemeyer<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @MakisH, @mohd-afeef-badri Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@MakisH & @mohd-afeef-badri, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @kyleniemeyer know.
β¨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest β¨
Checklists
@MakisH, please create your checklist typing:
@editorialbot generate my checklist
@mohd-afeef-badri, please create your checklist typing:
@editorialbot generate my checklist