Open editorialbot opened 1 week ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
β
OK DOIs
- 10.21105/joss.00602 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7808904 is OK
- 10.1007/s12532-023-00239-3 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.02018 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110467 is OK
- 10.2514/3.10041 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.05187 is OK
- 10.1063/5.0166685 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2024.126150 is OK
- 10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:GCEWTP>2.3.CO;2 is OK
π‘ SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Open Field Operation and Manipulation
- No DOI given, and none found for title: SU2
- No DOI given, and none found for title: CODE_SATURN
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Differentialequations.jlβa performant and feature-...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Knet
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Instead of Rewriting Foreign Code for Machine Lear...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: WaterLily.jl: A differentiable and backend-agnosti...
β MISSING DOIs
- 10.1079/cabicompendium.102342 may be a valid DOI for title: Gerris
β INVALID DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2017.12.008 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.22 s (959.3 files/s, 132965.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julia 168 3602 3294 15344
CSV 4 0 0 2508
Markdown 22 759 0 2251
SVG 4 0 0 525
TeX 1 19 0 190
GLSL 3 22 35 120
YAML 3 3 5 86
TOML 3 5 0 63
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 208 4410 3334 21087
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
842 Humberto
313 OscarOsborn
246 TomMazin
157 mberto79
143 Humberto Medina
53 Christopher D. Ellis
4 Tim
1 s-ambrose-9
Paper file info:
π Wordcount for paper.md
is 1555
β
The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
β
License found: Mozilla Public License 2.0
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@editorialbot invite @AnjaliSandip as editor
Hi @AnjaliSandip, could you handle this submission?
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
SyntheticEddyMethod.jl: A Julia package for the creation of inlet flow conditions for LES
Submitting author: @carlodev
Handling editor: @philipcardiff (Active)
Reviewers: @atzberg, @akshaysridhar
Similarity score: 0.7575
GridapDistributed: a massively parallel finite element toolbox in Julia
Submitting author: @amartinhuertas
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @PetrKryslUCSD, @Leticia-maria, @jedbrown
Similarity score: 0.7516
Kinetic.jl: A portable finite volume toolbox for scientific and neural computing
Submitting author: @vavrines
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @rdeits, @jarvist
Similarity score: 0.7508
RHEA: an open-source Reproducible Hybrid-architecture flow solver Engineered for Academia
Submitting author: @lluisjofre
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @ctdegroot, @thomasgillis
Similarity score: 0.7481
HallThruster.jl: a Julia package for 1D Hall thruster discharge simulation
Submitting author: @archermarx
Handling editor: @lucydot (Active)
Reviewers: @Rupali-Sahu, @TomGoffrey, @lucydot
Similarity score: 0.7475
β οΈ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@kyleniemeyer, I am happy to edit this submission.
@editorialbot assign @AnjaliSandip as editor
Assigned! @AnjaliSandip is now the editor
@mberto79, if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers, please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Hi @AnjaliSandip,
Thank you for agreeing to act as the editor for our submission.
I looked at the list and I have a list of potential reviewers (with a short justification):
justinsgray - background in aerodynamics could be valuable to comment on application side.
Vincent Le Chenadec - background in numerical analysis, an in particular linear algebra, could be valuable to comment on approaches we used to solve the linear systems resulting from the VFM discretisation
mancellin - background in Finite Volume Method could be valuable since this is the underpinning method used in XCALibre.jl
simone-silvestri - background in CUDA could be valuable to comment on the approach used to write for multiple compute backends
Kind regards, Humberto
π@justinsgray, @mancellin, @vlc1 & @simone-silvestri, would you review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html.
Hi @AnjaliSandip sure thing!
Hi @AnjaliSandip sure, the project seems very interesting.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@mberto79<!--end-author-handle-- (Humberto Medina) Repository: https://github.com/mberto79/XCALibre.jl Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-submission Version: v0.3.1 Editor: !--editor-->@AnjaliSandip<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mberto79. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@mberto79 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: