Open editorialbot opened 3 hours ago
editorialbot
commented
3 hours ago Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commandsFor example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdfReference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.1017/S1743921311000378 is OK
- 10.1145/3272127.3275092 is OK
- 10.1145/235815.235821 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: CGAL User and Reference Manual
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Geogram: a programming library of geometric algori...
❌ MISSING DOIs
- 10.2172/946741 may be a valid DOI for title: VORO++: A three-dimensional Voronoi cell library i...
❌ INVALID DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parco.2023.102995 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.77 s (75.6 files/s, 409812.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C++ 25 1536 169 309445
Python 3 136 56 1118
C/C++ Header 14 200 170 525
Markdown 2 80 0 282
CMake 9 51 12 176
YAML 2 20 42 117
TeX 1 6 0 65
Bourne Shell 2 5 2 54
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 58 2034 451 311782
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Commit count by author:
274 samridh-dev
2 Samridh D. SinghPaper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 705
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section
editorialbot
commented
3 hours ago License info:
🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)
editorialbot
commented
3 hours ago :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
editorialbot
commented
3 hours ago Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
DTCC Builder: A mesh generator for automatic, efficient, and robust mesh generation for large-scale city modeling and simulation
Submitting author: @anderslogg
Handling editor: @crvernon (Active)
Reviewers: @ifthompson, @ipadjen
Similarity score: 0.7248
Efficient Polyhedral Gravity Modeling in Modern C++ and Python
Submitting author: @schuhmaj
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @mikegrudic, @santisoler
Similarity score: 0.7121
VAST: the Void Analysis Software Toolkit
Submitting author: @kadglass
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @changhoonhahn, @lavaux
Similarity score: 0.7046
SiSyPHE: A Python package for the Simulation of Systems of interacting mean-field Particles with High Efficiency
Submitting author: @antoinediez
Handling editor: @pdebuyl (Active)
Reviewers: @lorenzo-rovigatti, @junghans
Similarity score: 0.6967
BoxKit: A Python library to manage analysis of block-structured simulation datasets
Submitting author: @akashdhruv
Handling editor: @kellyrowland (Active)
Reviewers: @rvg296, @Abinashbunty
Similarity score: 0.6966
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
danielskatz
commented
3 hours ago @samridh-dev - thanks for your submission. Our LOC counter shows 300k LOC of C++ in your repository. It seems likely that this is not all your code, but that you are including code from other packages. Can you help me understand what part of this is your code that we should be reviewing, and what is preexisting code that we would not review?
samridh-dev
commented
3 hours ago Hi, Do not review the test cases since I believe that is auto generated and is probably why the code is around 300k. The main source code is around 30k instead,
From: Daniel S. Katz @.> Sent: Friday, November 1, 2024 2:37 PM To: openjournals/joss-reviews @.> Cc: Singh, Samridh Dev (Sam) @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: votess: A multi-target, GPU-capable, parallel Voronoi tessellator (Issue #7419)
Caution: External Email
@samridh-devhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_samridh-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=HUrdOLg_tCr0UMeDjWLBOM9lLDRpsndbROGxEKQRFzk&r=HWASZq6TcwVwkJpqA8x6LcNTa2Fa6N92aMe4xwgG2Pk&m=RR8jWEjt36nazbPfi_IG0ypnnRRueTk9Ny6Jy1ZbvwftxJHrlat4h-oDjfyVKbql&s=GhQZHdOT8UETA6Lxeh4MKu9-CLt0K80Dz8Pp_6ru1gM&e= - thanks for your submission. Our LOC counter shows 300k LOC of C++ in your repository. It seems likely that this is not all your code, but that you are including code from other packages. Can you help me understand what part of this is your code that we should be reviewing, and what is preexisting code that we would not review?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openjournals_joss-2Dreviews_issues_7419-23issuecomment-2D2452477088&d=DwMFaQ&c=HUrdOLg_tCr0UMeDjWLBOM9lLDRpsndbROGxEKQRFzk&r=HWASZq6TcwVwkJpqA8x6LcNTa2Fa6N92aMe4xwgG2Pk&m=RR8jWEjt36nazbPfi_IG0ypnnRRueTk9Ny6Jy1ZbvwftxJHrlat4h-oDjfyVKbql&s=QFaSsYCinn81DlOjemVKQ7exoIn7JhpKP5YnZrB-L2w&e=, or unsubscribehttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_notifications_unsubscribe-2Dauth_BASUXMH7T2AJJM3XILFCLW3Z6PJ53AVCNFSM6AAAAABRA2XNGCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINJSGQ3TOMBYHA&d=DwMFaQ&c=HUrdOLg_tCr0UMeDjWLBOM9lLDRpsndbROGxEKQRFzk&r=HWASZq6TcwVwkJpqA8x6LcNTa2Fa6N92aMe4xwgG2Pk&m=RR8jWEjt36nazbPfi_IG0ypnnRRueTk9Ny6Jy1ZbvwftxJHrlat4h-oDjfyVKbql&s=Q87KAJ9nF0zxoaN14uosuES87GE7Cy6DU5_8y_Leygs&e=. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
This email was sent from outside Grinnell College. Treat attachments and links with caution. If this message looks suspicious, use the report phish button.
danielskatz
commented
3 hours ago Which part of the code (meaning which directories) should be counted and reviewed?
samridh-dev
commented
2 hours ago Only the src/ and include/ directories should be reviewed.
From: Daniel S. Katz @.> Sent: Friday, November 1, 2024 2:40 PM To: openjournals/joss-reviews @.> Cc: Singh, Samridh Dev (Sam) @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: votess: A multi-target, GPU-capable, parallel Voronoi tessellator (Issue #7419)
Caution: External Email
Which part of the code (meaning which directories) should be counted and reviewed?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openjournals_joss-2Dreviews_issues_7419-23issuecomment-2D2452481438&d=DwMFaQ&c=HUrdOLg_tCr0UMeDjWLBOM9lLDRpsndbROGxEKQRFzk&r=HWASZq6TcwVwkJpqA8x6LcNTa2Fa6N92aMe4xwgG2Pk&m=-aaMhHOxo5yvCVoZ5UrQnXvK2aQNvHg-evuVsMfPlVR84AHQQ1hSQ2fRbDlYqI2N&s=Xyz1Hu-diNlcEwif1JwFuq2d77GSi_LiP2S1xdDGPn4&e=, or unsubscribehttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_notifications_unsubscribe-2Dauth_BASUXMCWGEMZDXWK5BLBUD3Z6PKK7AVCNFSM6AAAAABRA2XNGCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINJSGQ4DCNBTHA&d=DwMFaQ&c=HUrdOLg_tCr0UMeDjWLBOM9lLDRpsndbROGxEKQRFzk&r=HWASZq6TcwVwkJpqA8x6LcNTa2Fa6N92aMe4xwgG2Pk&m=-aaMhHOxo5yvCVoZ5UrQnXvK2aQNvHg-evuVsMfPlVR84AHQQ1hSQ2fRbDlYqI2N&s=iKGYgY8TZi0IyTgGfmyrT586cI4uoFx0teG4ezPF3P4&e=. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
This email was sent from outside Grinnell College. Treat attachments and links with caution. If this message looks suspicious, use the report phish button.
danielskatz
commented
2 hours ago 👋 @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman - Would you be interested in editing (or reviewing) this submission?
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@samridh-dev<!--end-author-handle-- (Samridh Dev Singh) Repository: https://github.com/samridh-dev/votess.git Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @samridh-dev. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@samridh-dev if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: