Open editorialbot opened 2 weeks ago
editorialbot
commented
2 weeks ago Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commandsFor example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdfSoftware report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.48 s (612.4 files/s, 422385.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON 18 0 0 136530
HTML 83 2216 238 20677
JavaScript 18 3991 4158 7210
Python 53 1421 5353 4277
SVG 1 0 0 2671
CSS 6 198 51 824
YAML 8 63 18 766
reStructuredText 76 3392 4631 569
Vuejs Component 6 42 79 427
Markdown 6 75 0 248
TeX 1 16 0 158
Dockerfile 2 32 28 80
TypeScript 7 13 20 76
Bourne Shell 3 13 11 43
Scheme 1 0 0 28
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
make 1 4 7 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 291 11484 14595 174619
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Commit count by author:
1208 Casey Li
400 Luke Parkinson
135 Pooja3894
103 Pooja Khosla
37 Rose Pearson
22 PoojaKhosla
13 Xander Cai
7 GRI Admin
5 xandercai
4 Casey
4 Martin
4 Sam Thompson
3 Angus L
2 Martin Nguyen
2 sli229
1 UOCNT
1 martin20494Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1255
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section
editorialbot
commented
2 weeks ago License info:
🟡 License found: GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)
editorialbot
commented
2 weeks ago Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105842 is OK
- 10.3390/ijerph18083952 is OK
- 10.1080/17477891.2022.2142500 is OK
- 10.1038/s41467-022-30725-6 is OK
- 10.1080/03036758.2023.2211777 is OK
- 10.1080/19475705.2018.1552630 is OK
- 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1123016/v1 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Flood Resilience Digital Twin (FReDT)
- No DOI given, and none found for title: BG Flood
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Mā te haumaru ō ngā puna wai ō Rākaihautū ka ora m...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Flooding Brings Deep Trouble
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Climate Change Implications for New Zealand
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Hydrological projections for New Zealand rivers un...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Hirds.v3: High Intensity Rainfall Design System – ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Towards a National Digital Twin for Flood Resilien...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Regional Flood Estimation Tool for New Zealand Par...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Regional Flood Estimation Tool for New Zealand Par...
❌ MISSING DOIs
- None
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
cheginit
commented
2 weeks ago 👋🏼 @LukeParky, @pritamd47, @changliao1025, this is the review thread for the paper. All of our communications will happen here from now on.
As a reviewer, the first step, as mentioned in the first comment of this issue, is to create a checklist for your review by entering
@editorialbot generate my checklist
as the top of a new comment in this thread.
These checklists contain the JOSS requirements. As you go over the submission, please check any items that you feel have been satisfied. The first comment in this thread also contains links to the JOSS reviewer guidelines.
The JOSS review is different from most other journals. Our goal is to work with the authors to help them meet our criteria instead of merely passing judgment on the submission. As such, the reviewers are encouraged to submit issues and pull requests on the software repository. When doing so, please mention openjournals/joss-reviews#7433 so that a link is created to this thread (and I can keep an eye on what is happening). Please also feel free to comment and ask questions on this thread. In my experience, it is better to post comments/questions/suggestions as you come across them, instead of waiting until you've reviewed the entire package.
We aim for reviews to be completed within about 2-4 weeks. Please notify me if any of you require some more time. We can also use EditorialBot (our bot) to set automatic reminders if you know you'll be away for a known period of time.
Please don't hesitate to ping me (@cheginit) if you have any questions/concerns.
editorialbot
commented
2 weeks ago :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
pritamd47
commented
1 week ago cheginit
commented
11 hours ago 👋🏼 @LukeParky, @pritamd47, @changliao1025 Could you please provide us with an update on the progress of your review?
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@LukeParky<!--end-author-handle-- (Luke Parkinson) Repository: https://github.com/GeospatialResearch/Digital-Twins Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): master Version: v1.2.0 Editor: !--editor-->@cheginit<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @pritamd47, @changliao1025 Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@pritamd47 & @changliao1025, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @cheginit know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
📝 Checklist for @pritamd47