Open editorialbot opened 2 weeks ago
editorialbot
commented
2 weeks ago Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commandsFor example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdfSoftware report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.09 s (1041.1 files/s, 170675.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 49 2066 3035 6395
XML 1 0 52 1534
Markdown 24 291 0 1070
YAML 13 43 16 690
TeX 1 12 2 322
TOML 1 14 0 151
JSON 5 1 0 28
CSS 1 2 0 13
Bourne Shell 1 0 0 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 96 2429 3105 10204
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Commit count by author:
600 Dobson
279 barneydobson
46 dependabot[bot]
34 Diego Alonso Alvarez
24 pre-commit-ci[bot]
13 Tom Bland
5 Daniel Cummins
3 Barnaby Dobson
2 James Paul Turner
1 AadiUJ
1 Adrian D'Alessandro
1 Dan Cummins
1 Diego Alonso ÁlvarezPaper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 854
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section
editorialbot
commented
2 weeks ago License info:
✅ License found: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)
editorialbot
commented
2 weeks ago :warning: An error happened when generating the pdf. Problem with ORCID (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0149-4124) for Barnaby Dobson. ORCID looks to be the wrong length.
editorialbot
commented
2 weeks ago Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B4-125-2016 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.004 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Modelling transitions in urban water systems
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Google-Microsoft Open Buildings
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Planet dump retrieved from https://planet.osm.org
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Overture Maps Foundation
❌ MISSING DOIs
- 10.1007/s12665-011-1146-1 may be a valid DOI for title: Sewer model development under minimum data require...
- 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101370 may be a valid DOI for title: Automatic mapping of urban wastewater networks bas...
- 10.1029/2021wr030778 may be a valid DOI for title: A reduced complexity model with graph partitioning...
- 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.005 may be a valid DOI for title: Identifying fit-for-purpose lumped surrogate model...
- 10.5194/hess-26-4279-2022 may be a valid DOI for title: An algorithm for deriving the topology of belowgro...
- 10.3390/w15010046 may be a valid DOI for title: An evaluation framework for urban pluvial flooding...
- 10.31223/x5gt5x may be a valid DOI for title: SWMManywhere: A global-scale workflow for generati...
- 10.3389/fenvs.2021.626634 may be a valid DOI for title: Data reduced method for cost comparison of wastewa...
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
kthyng
commented
2 weeks ago 👋 @barneydobson - note that your paper does not compile. Please follow the example paper and note that you can click on the error above to find out more about it. Then use the command @editorialbot check references to check again, and the command @editorialbot generate pdf after making changes to the .md file to make a new PDF. editorialbot commands need to be the first entry in a new comment.
barneydobson
commented
2 weeks ago @editorialbot check references
Thanks @kthyng - TIL mendeley bibtex export doesn't include DOI 🤦♂️
editorialbot
commented
2 weeks ago Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.1007/s12665-011-1146-1 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101370 is OK
- 10.1029/2021wr030778 is OK
- 10.1016/j.watres.2017.09.039 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.005 is OK
- 10.5194/hess-26-4279-2022 is OK
- 10.3390/w15010046 is OK
- 10.31223/X5GT5X is OK
- 10.3389/fenvs.2021.626634 is OK
- 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B4-125-2016 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.004 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Google-Microsoft Open Buildings
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Planet dump retrieved from https://planet.osm.org
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Overture Maps Foundation
❌ MISSING DOIs
- None
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot
commented
2 weeks ago :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
editorialbot
commented
2 weeks ago Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
PySWMM: The Python Interface to Stormwater Management Model (SWMM)
Submitting author: @katmratliff
Handling editor: @kbarnhart (Retired)
Reviewers: @nickrsan, @jrkasprzyk
Similarity score: 0.7639
VisWaterNet: A Python package for visualization of water distribution networks
Submitting author: @meghnathomas
Handling editor: @crvernon (Active)
Reviewers: @erexer, @thurber
Similarity score: 0.7314
NeuralHydrology --- A Python library for Deep Learning research in hydrology
Submitting author: @kratzert
Handling editor: @elbeejay (Active)
Reviewers: @ammilten, @chuckaustin, @jhamman
Similarity score: 0.7152
pyflowline: a mesh-independent river network generator for hydrologic models
Submitting author: @changliao1025
Handling editor: @observingClouds (Active)
Reviewers: @smchartrand, @andres-patrignani
Similarity score: 0.7145
HyRiver: Hydroclimate Data Retriever
Submitting author: @cheginit
Handling editor: @kthyng (Active)
Reviewers: @raoulcollenteur, @arbennett
Similarity score: 0.6980
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
kthyng
commented
1 week ago @barneydobson Thanks!
Hi @barneydobson and thanks for your submission! I am looking for some specific items to make sure your submission fits our requirements at a high level (not at the more detailed review level) before moving on to finding an editor or putting this on our waitlist if no relevant editors are available. I'll comment over time as I have a chance to go through them:
In the meantime, please take a look at the comments above ⬆️ from the editorialbot to address any DOI, license, or paper issues if you're able (there may not be any), or suggest reviewers. For reviewers, please suggest 5 reviewers from the database listed above or your own (non-conflicted) extended network. Their github handles are most useful to receive but please don't use "@" to reference them since it will prematurely ping them.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@barneydobson<!--end-author-handle-- (Barnaby Dobson) Repository: https://github.com/ImperialCollegeLondon/SWMManywhere Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 0.1.10 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @barneydobson. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@barneydobson if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: