Open editorialbot opened 1 week ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
β
OK DOIs
- 10.1115/1.3101670 is OK
- 10.1007/s00466-024-02473-5 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cma.2022.115766 is OK
π‘ SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Choose Between Thread-Based and Process-Based Envi...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Compare Performance of parfor, parfeval, and spmd
- No DOI given, and none found for title: spmd - Execute code in parallel on workers of para...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: parfor β Execute for-loop iterations in parallel o...
β MISSING DOIs
- 10.1007/978-3-642-18255-6 may be a valid DOI for title: A course on damage mechanics
- 10.1615/intjmultcompeng.v6.i3.50 may be a valid DOI for title: A nonlinear dual-domain decomposition method: Appl...
β INVALID DOIs
- None
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.04 s (1561.3 files/s, 108850.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MATLAB 60 891 1072 2324
TeX 1 8 0 62
Markdown 2 24 0 57
YAML 1 1 4 19
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 64 924 1076 2462
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
22 Habiba-Eldababy
Paper file info:
π Wordcount for paper.md
is 1445
π΄ Failed to discover a Statement of need
section in paper
License info:
β
License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
PDLSM-FEM: Solver of Coupled Peridynamics Least Squares Minimization with Finite Element Method
Submitting author: @QibangLiu
Handling editor: @prashjha (Active)
Reviewers: @TLCFEM, @karthikncsu, @Balaje
Similarity score: 0.6999
BasicTools: a numerical simulation toolbox
Submitting author: @fbordeu
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @hvonwah, @sthavishtha
Similarity score: 0.6947
SeismicMesh: Triangular meshing for seismology
Submitting author: @krober10nd
Handling editor: @meg-simula (Retired)
Reviewers: @nschloe, @jorgensd
Similarity score: 0.6926
NLMech: Implementation of finite difference/meshfree discretization of nonlocal fracture models
Submitting author: @diehlpk
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @vijaysm, @chennachaos
Similarity score: 0.6855
cRacklet: a spectral boundary integral method library for interfacial rupture simulation
Submitting author: @tiburoch
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @srmnitc, @kylebeggs
Similarity score: 0.6833
β οΈ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@Habiba-Eldababy - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.
While we are waiting, could you please:
@editorialbot generate pdf @editorialbot check references
For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!
@Habiba-Eldababy before we assign an editor, can you please address the question about how your software is tested? We don't require automated testing / continuous integration, but software does need to have tests set up somehow.
@diehlpk assuming the software will move to review after addressing the above questions, would you be able to edit this one?
Yes, but I can only start mid of December.
@editorialbot generate pdf
:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
PDLSM-FEM: Solver of Coupled Peridynamics Least Squares Minimization with Finite Element Method
Submitting author: @QibangLiu
Handling editor: @prashjha (Active)
Reviewers: @TLCFEM, @karthikncsu, @Balaje
Similarity score: 0.6999
BasicTools: a numerical simulation toolbox
Submitting author: @fbordeu
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @hvonwah, @sthavishtha
Similarity score: 0.6995
SeismicMesh: Triangular meshing for seismology
Submitting author: @krober10nd
Handling editor: @meg-simula (Retired)
Reviewers: @nschloe, @jorgensd
Similarity score: 0.6931
cRacklet: a spectral boundary integral method library for interfacial rupture simulation
Submitting author: @tiburoch
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @srmnitc, @kylebeggs
Similarity score: 0.6854
NLMech: Implementation of finite difference/meshfree discretization of nonlocal fracture models
Submitting author: @diehlpk
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @vijaysm, @chennachaos
Similarity score: 0.6849
β οΈ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
Hi @arfon @kyleniemeyer ! Thank you for your initial comments and feedback. I have updated the DOIs and renamed the statement of need section. There are instructions for testing and running the code in the README file. Please let me know if you need any additional information.
Thank you, @Habiba-Eldababy. I think this looks sufficient to begin review, although reviewers may have additional feedback.
@editorialbot assign @diehlpk as editor
with the understanding that @diehlpk will begin handling the submission mid-December. Thanks!
Assigned! @diehlpk is now the editor
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@Habiba-Eldababy<!--end-author-handle-- (Habiba Eldababy) Repository: https://github.com/Habiba-Eldababy/Parallel-CDM Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: MATLAB R2022b Editor: !--editor-->@diehlpk<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Habiba-Eldababy. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@Habiba-Eldababy if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: