[PRE REVIEW]: SynthEddy: A Python program for generating synthetic turbulent flow fields

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@omltcat<!--end-author-handle-- (Ange (Phil) Du) Repository: https://github.com/omltcat/turbulent-flow Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ee1535affda6292c4e8fdcfc73f875f9"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ee1535affda6292c4e8fdcfc73f875f9/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ee1535affda6292c4e8fdcfc73f875f9/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ee1535affda6292c4e8fdcfc73f875f9)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @omltcat. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@omltcat if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1080/00102209908924192 is OK
- 10.1063/1.3006077 is OK
- 10.1007/s10494-013-9488-2 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- None

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2008.02.002 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000655 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2014.12.007 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.05 s (1868.3 files/s, 205698.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TeX                             21           1168            901           3668
Python                          32            553            635           2186
Markdown                        20            137              0            442
make                             9             49             26            130
JSON                             6              0              0            127
YAML                             3             14              4             78
INI                              1              0              0             11
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            92           1921           1566           6642
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   159  Omelette 蛋卷
    26  omltcat
     3  Spencer Smith
     1  Phil Du

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1501

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[arfon]

@omltcat - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

While you are waiting, please take a look at shortening your paper a little – 1000 words is our recommended length.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

flowTorch - a Python library for analysis and reduced-order modeling of fluid flows Submitting author: @AndreWeiner Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active) Reviewers: @akaptano, @JaroslavHron, @salrm8, @hkjeldsberg Similarity score: 0.7311

HW2D: A reference implementation of the Hasegawa-Wakatani model for plasma turbulence in fusion reactors Submitting author: @the-rccg Handling editor: @kyleniemeyer (Active) Reviewers: @archermarx, @Uddiptaatwork Similarity score: 0.7122

Snek5000: a new Python framework for Nek5000 Submitting author: @paugier Handling editor: @philipcardiff (Active) Reviewers: @joneuhauser, @maxhutch Similarity score: 0.7073

NebulaSEM: A high-order discontinuous Galerkin spectral element code for atmospheric modeling Submitting author: @dshawul Handling editor: @observingClouds (Active) Reviewers: @capitalaslash, @esclapez Similarity score: 0.7061

OpenCMP: An Open-Source Computational Multiphysics Package Submitting author: @nasserma Handling editor: @lucydot (Active) Reviewers: @bonh, @WilkAndy Similarity score: 0.6942

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.