[PRE REVIEW]: CUDA-METRO: Parallel Metropolis Monte-Carlo for 2D Atomistic Spin Texture Simulation

editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@arkavo@phibeck<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a7010c1182f894d9a781ff2d44036783"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a7010c1182f894d9a781ff2d44036783/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a7010c1182f894d9a781ff2d44036783/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a7010c1182f894d9a781ff2d44036783)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @arkavo. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@arkavo if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.04 s (2257.6 files/s, 109600.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          16            340           1053           1549
Markdown                         3            117              0            368
TeX                              1             20              0            339
JSON                            10              0              0            240
CSV                             54              0              0            100
TOML                             1              2              0             21
YAML                             1              1              4             21
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            86            480           1057           2638
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   129  arkavo
   101  Arkavo Hait
     4  ⟨Line⟩

editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1007/BF01328601 is OK
- 10.1063/1.1699114 is OK
- 10.1088/2053-1583/aaf06d is OK
- 10.1063/5.0042917 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.224414 is OK
- 10.1038/s41467-020-20497-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41524-023-01129-x is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.184401 is OK
- 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100625 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.224414 is OK
- 10.1088/0953-8984/26/10/103202 is OK
- 10.48550/ARXIV.2108.02219 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-018-21623-3 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04803 is OK
- 10.1109/TMAG.2004.836740 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c00836 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.17.1133 is OK
- 10.1038/nature22391 is OK
- 10.1038/s41524-020-00416-1 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: The fascinating world of Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert e...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.1088/2399-6528/aba035 may be a valid DOI for title: Number of equidistant neighbors on honeycomb latti...

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 2369

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 1 week ago

License info:

✅ License found: Apache License 2.0 (Valid open source OSI approved license)

editorialbot commented 1 week ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

ACHR.cu: GPU-accelerated sampling of metabolic networks Submitting author: @marouenbg Handling editor: @lpantano (Active) Reviewers: @wmegchel, @prasunanand Similarity score: 0.6814

QMCTorch: a PyTorch Implementation of Real-Space Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations of Molecular Systems Submitting author: @NicoRenaud Handling editor: @jarvist (Retired) Reviewers: @tonnylou44853, @scemama, @AbdAmmar Similarity score: 0.6811

MeMC: A package for Monte Carlo simulations of spherical shells Submitting author: @vipinagrawal25 Handling editor: @fboehm (Active) Reviewers: @victorapm, @mgiardino Similarity score: 0.6706

pylattica: a package for prototyping lattice models in chemistry and materials science Submitting author: @mcgalcode Handling editor: @richardjgowers (Retired) Reviewers: @riesben, @amkrajewski Similarity score: 0.6607

Disimpy: A massively parallel Monte Carlo simulator for generating diffusion-weighted MRI data in Python Submitting author: @kerkelae Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active) Reviewers: @DARSakthi, @grlee77, @ritagnunes Similarity score: 0.6584

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

arfon commented 1 week ago

@arkavo - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 3 days ago

@arkavo Dear author, thanks for this submission. I am the AEiC on this track and here to help process the initial steps. Before we proceed, please can you have a look at the following points:

[x] Please study the above reference check :point_up: and see if you can address any of the reported potential DOI issues. You can add/amend DOI entries in your .bib file, and call @editorialbot check references here to check them again.
[x] Your project appears to lack contributing guidelines at the moment. Please work to add these and to mention/link to them in your README. You could for instance create a CONTRIBUTING.md file (see here for some examples: https://contributing.md/example/).

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 3 days ago

@editorialbot invite @phibeck as editor

editorialbot commented 3 days ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

arkavo commented 2 days ago

@editorialbot check references

editorialbot commented 2 days ago

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1007/BF01328601 is OK
- 10.1063/1.1699114 is OK
- 10.1088/2053-1583/aaf06d is OK
- 10.1063/5.0042917 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.224414 is OK
- 10.1038/s41467-020-20497-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41524-023-01129-x is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.184401 is OK
- 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100625 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.224414 is OK
- 10.1088/0953-8984/26/10/103202 is OK
- 10.48550/ARXIV.2108.02219 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-018-21623-3 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04803 is OK
- 10.1109/TMAG.2004.836740 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c00836 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.17.1133 is OK
- 10.1038/nature22391 is OK
- 10.1038/s41524-020-00416-1 is OK
- 10.1088/2399-6528/aba035 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: The fascinating world of Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert e...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

arkavo commented 2 days ago

[ ] Please study the above reference check ☝️ and see if you can address any of the reported potential DOI issues. You can add/amend DOI entries in your .bib file, and call @editorialbot check references here to check them again.

[ ] Your project appears to lack contributing guidelines at the moment. Please work to add these and to mention/link to them in your README. You could for instance create a CONTRIBUTING.md file (see here for some examples: https://contributing.md/example/).

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman I've added the necessary missing reference and the contributing.md and code_of_conduct.md files. Please move forward as necessary Thanks.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 2 days ago

@arkavo thanks for making those changes. That looks good now.

phibeck commented 1 day ago

@editorialbot assign @phibeck as editor

editorialbot commented 1 day ago

Assigned! @phibeck is now the editor

phibeck commented 1 day ago

Hi @arkavo, thanks for your submission. I'll be looking for reviewers next. When you have a moment, it would be helpful if you could:

identify a few potential reviewers from this list https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers (without tagging them with an @)
please check the rendering of the manuscript, as there seem to be issues with equations, numbers and symbols
think about whether you can shorten the summary in the paper to avoid duplication of the software documentation in the git repo. I see that the figures and part of the summary is already contained in the docs, so perhaps it makes sense to move the rest of the summary there as well, and instead include a "summary describing the high-level functionality and purpose of the software for a diverse, non-specialist audience" (see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/paper.html#what-should-my-paper-contain) As a side note, your paper is on the longer side with >2000 words (we aim for 250-1000 words)

arkavo commented 1 day ago

Hi @phibeck

We have identified 2 potential reviewers from the JOSS list as Xu He and Hugo Strand which we think would be an ideal fit for our work.
We are working on the other points that you have raised regarding the manuscript.

openjournals / joss-reviews

[PRE REVIEW]: CUDA-METRO: Parallel Metropolis Monte-Carlo for 2D Atomistic Spin Texture Simulation #7458

Status