openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
725 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: NeuroAnalyzer: Julia toolbox for analyzing neurophysiological data #7465

Open editorialbot opened 1 week ago

editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@AdamWysokinski<!--end-author-handle-- (Adam Wysokiński) Repository: https://github.com/JuliaHealth/NeuroAnalyzer.jl Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.24.11 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/cefb2c86708619ddd786b49ce47c98df"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/cefb2c86708619ddd786b49ce47c98df/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/cefb2c86708619ddd786b49ce47c98df/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/cefb2c86708619ddd786b49ce47c98df)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @AdamWysokinski. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@AdamWysokinski if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.39 s (759.7 files/s, 162461.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julia                          277          11873          12415          36385
Markdown                         4            108              0            831
CSV                              1              0              0            307
GLSL                             1              0              0            167
TOML                             2              5              0            143
TeX                              1              6              0             93
Bourne Shell                     2              1              0             88
Arduino Sketch                   2             20             24             87
YAML                             2              6              4             68
Dockerfile                       1              9              2             15
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           293          12028          12445          38184
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

  1433  Adam Wysokiński
   316  Adam Wysokinski
    34  Adam
    27  CI Builder
    10  michalrzak
     1  Jacob S. Zelko
editorialbot commented 1 week ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
- 10.1145/3276490 is OK
- 10.1155/2011/130714 is OK
- 10.1155/2011/156869 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2013.00267 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Meet Julia: The Future of Data Science

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1334

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 1 week ago

License info:

✅ License found: BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

arfon commented 1 week ago

@AdamWysokinski - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

editorialbot commented 1 week ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 1 week ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Openseize: A digital signal processing package for large EEG datasets in Python Submitting author: @mscaudill Handling editor: @samhforbes (Active) Reviewers: @szorowi1, @AJQuinn Similarity score: 0.7374

PhysioLabXR: A Python Platform for Real-Time, Multi-modal, Brain–Computer Interfaces and Extended Reality Experiments Submitting author: @ApocalyVec Handling editor: @mstimberg (Active) Reviewers: @lucask07, @nastaran62 Similarity score: 0.7157

Pycrostates: a Python library to study EEG microstates Submitting author: @vferat Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active) Reviewers: @AJQuinn, @vahid-sb, @tuliofalmeida, @anshu-97 Similarity score: 0.7018

pyomeca: An Open-Source Framework for Biomechanical Analysis Submitting author: @romainmartinez Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active) Reviewers: @BKillen05, @mitkof6 Similarity score: 0.7001

PyView: A general purpose tool for analyzing calcium imaging data Submitting author: @ajkswamy Handling editor: @csoneson (Active) Reviewers: @adamltyson, @Yannan-Chen Similarity score: 0.6986

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

AdamWysokinski commented 1 week ago

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

@arfon Thank you for letting me know. No problem, I'm not in a hurry. Just tell me if there is anything more that I should do now, since I'm new to the JOSS reviewing process.