Open editorialbot opened 1 week ago
Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.06 s (1973.7 files/s, 202535.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAML 43 837 40 3686
Python 34 593 327 2705
Markdown 18 682 0 1308
TeX 1 23 0 323
CSV 2 0 0 267
TOML 1 21 1 183
CSS 1 16 12 67
JavaScript 2 4 1 29
JSON 3 0 0 24
make 1 6 0 22
HTML 2 0 2 5
SVG 1 0 0 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 109 2182 383 8620
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
266 Samuel Rince
113 Adrien Banse
30 luc
10 Samuel RincΓ©
5 vinh
4 Luc BERTON
2 Clovis Varangot-Reille
2 Luc
1 DataForGood (Tech)
1 Nina P.
1 Yoann Couble
1 yco
Paper file info:
π Wordcount for paper.md
is 1057
β
The paper includes a Statement of need
section
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
β
OK DOIs
- 10.48550/arXiv.2211.02001 is OK
- 10.1016/j.joule.2023.09.004 is OK
- 10.1145/3630106.3658542 is OK
- 10.1016/j.suscom.2023.100857 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2104.10350 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1910.09700 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2302.13971 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2307.09288 is OK
- 10.3390/su14095172 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.11171501 is OK
- 10.1007/BF02986351 is OK
- 10.1007/s11367-019-01683-x is OK
- 10.1007/s11367-015-0897-4 is OK
- 10.1007/BF02978943 is OK
- 10.1007/BF02978624 is OK
π‘ SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Llama 3 Model Card
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Zeus: Understanding and Optimizing GPU Energy Cons...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: LLM-Perf Leaderboard
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Optimum-Benchmark: A framework for benchmarking th...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: BoaviztAPI: a bottom-up model to assess the enviro...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Digital technologies in Europe: an environmental l...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Global E-waste Monitor 2020. Quantities, flows...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis
β MISSING DOIs
- None
β INVALID DOIs
- None
License info:
β
License found: Mozilla Public License 2.0
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
cc @samuelrince
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@adrienbanse<!--end-author-handle-- (Adrien Banse) Repository: https://github.com/genai-impact/ecologits Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: v0.5.0 Editor: !--editor-->@Fei-Tao<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @jaywonchung, @vict0rsch Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@jaywonchung & @vict0rsch, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @Fei-Tao know.
β¨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest β¨
Checklists
π Checklist for @jaywonchung
π Checklist for @vict0rsch