Open editorialbot opened 1 day ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201833304 is OK
- 10.1177/00037028241241308 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2310.16896 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1811.06542 is OK
- 10.3390/universe9060287 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4365/ac88ce is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stv1230 is OK
- 10.1086/309985 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/sty3466 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ace31a is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202450886 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Time-frequency Analysis
- No DOI given, and none found for title: LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Two-Dimensional Correlation Analysis of Periodicit...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Fidgit: AGN DataChallenge
❌ MISSING DOIs
- 10.1086/170594 may be a valid DOI for title: 3C 345: Is the Variability of Quasars Nonlinear?
- 10.1093/mnras/sty1316 may be a valid DOI for title: Multifractality Signatures in Quasars Time Series ...
- 10.1038/159591a0 may be a valid DOI for title: Acoustical Quanta and the Theory of Hearing
- 10.3847/1538-3881/acb596 may be a valid DOI for title: Detecting Long-period Variability in the SDSS Stri...
- 10.1515/astro-2020-0007 may be a valid DOI for title: Two-Dimensional Correlation Analysis of Periodicit...
- 10.1093/mnras/staa737 may be a valid DOI for title: Confirmed Short Periodic Variability of Subparsec ...
- 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf731 may be a valid DOI for title: The Optical Variability of Supermassive Black Hole...
- 10.1093/mnras/stx3137 may be a valid DOI for title: Oscillatory Patterns in the Light curves of Five L...
- 10.1086/118137 may be a valid DOI for title: Wavelets for Period Analysis of Unevenly Sampled T...
- 10.1007/978-1-4612-2544-7_2 may be a valid DOI for title: Wavelets, Spectrum Analysis and 1/f Processes
- 10.1016/b978-0-12-811220-5.00002-2 may be a valid DOI for title: Advances in Two-Dimensional Correlation Spectrosco...
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=4.01 s (51.9 files/s, 326946.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSV 15 1 0 1105043
HTML 68 3388 272 41331
SVG 4 0 0 5360
Jupyter Notebook 22 0 142481 2392
Python 35 774 1760 1832
CSS 6 223 57 1015
JavaScript 12 131 221 880
reStructuredText 35 489 528 554
TeX 1 46 0 315
Markdown 2 61 0 146
YAML 3 11 0 59
TOML 1 7 0 54
make 2 16 18 43
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
JSON 1 0 0 23
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 208 5155 145338 1159073
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
65 lionandjelka
34 OS Kernel
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1421
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
pySYD: Automated measurements of global asteroseismic parameters
Submitting author: @ashleychontos
Handling editor: @mbobra (Active)
Reviewers: @danhey, @benjaminpope
Similarity score: 0.7134
ClassiPyGRB: Machine Learning-Based Classification and Visualization of Gamma Ray Bursts using t-SNE
Submitting author: @KenethGarcia
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @wkerzendorf, @dfm
Similarity score: 0.7132
pygwb: a Python-based library for gravitational-wave background searches
Submitting author: @a-renzini
Handling editor: @plaplant (Active)
Reviewers: @Sbozzolo, @cmbiwer
Similarity score: 0.7094
Mayawaves: Python Library for Interacting with the Einstein Toolkit and the MAYA Catalog
Submitting author: @deborahferguson
Handling editor: @eloisabentivegna (Retired)
Reviewers: @cjoana, @Sbozzolo
Similarity score: 0.6998
CWInPy: A Python package for inference with continuous gravitational-wave signals from pulsars
Submitting author: @mattpitkin
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @GregoryAshton, @ColmTalbot
Similarity score: 0.6958
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
Thank you. Here are my suggestions for potential reviewers: astrogilda afeinstein20 sgeorge91 rmorgan10 jessie-dotson bliiir
Hi @lionandjelka, and thanks for your submission to JOSS. All our editors are currently busy so I'm going to place this on our current waiting list. In any case, the project you've submitted has a variety of issues that I've listed below that need to be addressed before we open this up for an editor to pick up, so I'm going to tag it as "paused" until the following points are addressed.
The repo description says it's a "test repo of Qhx". Is that still true? I see you have several different Qhx repos, so it isn't clear this is the one you intended to submit.
There are a lot of extra files in the repo, including at least
0
, 1
, 2
and 3
,prof
andQhx.egg-info/
and build/
).I don't think any of these should be in the repo and are only likely to confuse any potential reviewers.
The Qhx documentation describes two versions of the same code. A final step in the JOSS publication process will be to tag a new release version, which is difficult to reconcile with having two versions. Regardless, just for ease-of-use, it makes more sense to have a single package with appropriate options—be that different functions or relevant arguments—to select between two different modes of execution.
This is less important at the outset but the paper is also a bit long. The JOSS documentation says:
The paper should be between 250-1000 words. Authors submitting papers significantly longer than 1000 words may be asked to reduce the length of their paper.
The JOSS paper should be little more than a brief summary of the software, how it fills a current niche and how it would be (or has been) used in research. At the very least, your section describing the contents of the documentation page ("Documentation and Tutorials") can be removed.
Feel free to ask me any questions and keep me posted on your progress through these items.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@lionandjelka<!--end-author-handle-- (Andjelka Kovacevic) Repository: https://github.com/lionandjelka/QhX1 Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper-submission Version: v0.2.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Warrick Ball
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @lionandjelka. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@lionandjelka if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: