Open editorialbot opened 18 hours ago
editorialbot
commented
18 hours ago Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commandsFor example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdfSoftware report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.04 s (1131.6 files/s, 181175.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 23 532 805 1893
Jupyter Notebook 5 0 1789 782
Markdown 2 36 0 165
TeX 1 6 0 86
YAML 3 6 4 59
reStructuredText 3 48 54 50
TOML 1 5 0 29
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
make 1 4 7 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 40 645 2660 3099
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Commit count by author:
17 Alan PearlReference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.21105/astro.2105.05859 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stac3118 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stad456 is OK
- 10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy pr...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Multivariate Density Estimation
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Mathematical methods of statistics
❌ MISSING DOIs
- None
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1259
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section
editorialbot
commented
18 hours ago License info:
✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)
editorialbot
commented
18 hours ago :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
jbytecode
commented
18 hours ago Dear Reviewers @landreman and @ewu63
You can start by creating your task lists. Each list will contain several tasks.
As you complete each task, you can check off the corresponding checkbox. Since the review process for JOSS is interactive, you are encouraged to engage with the author, other reviewers, and the editor throughout. You can open issues and submit pull requests in the target repository. Please include the URL of this page in those interactions, so we can keep track of activities outside of the platform.
To generate your task list, simply type:
@editorialbot generate my checklist
Thank you in advance.
landreman
commented
14 hours ago
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@AlanPearl<!--end-author-handle-- (Alan Pearl) Repository: https://github.com/AlanPearl/diffopt Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@jbytecode<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @landreman, @ewu63 Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@landreman & @ewu63, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @jbytecode know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
📝 Checklist for @landreman