Open editorialbot opened 21 hours ago
Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.22 s (1182.4 files/s, 313296.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C/C++ Header 49 2854 3327 15094
C++ 69 2031 1857 12100
Python 73 3004 1615 10561
reStructuredText 32 3154 2979 5543
YAML 17 362 184 1556
CMake 9 245 286 1189
SVG 2 0 0 854
Markdown 5 159 0 465
TOML 2 12 0 86
TeX 1 7 0 64
JSON 1 0 0 32
Bourne Shell 1 5 12 27
INI 1 0 0 22
CSS 1 0 0 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 263 11833 10260 47596
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
111 Anders Reenberg Andersen
6 Jesper Fink Andersen
2 jesperfink
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
β
OK DOIs
- 10.1002/9780470316887 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.07.007 is OK
π‘ SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Maintenance optimization for multi-component syste...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: pymdptoolbox
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Markov Decision Processes (MDP) Toolbox
- No DOI given, and none found for title: createMDP (Matlab)
- No DOI given, and none found for title: POMDPs.jl: A Framework for Sequential Decision Mak...
β MISSING DOIs
- 10.32614/cran.package.mdptoolbox may be a valid DOI for title: MDPtoolbox: Markov Decision Processes Toolbox
β INVALID DOIs
- None
Paper file info:
π Wordcount for paper.md
is 724
β
The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
β
License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@areenberg<!--end-author-handle-- (Anders Reenberg Andersen) Repository: https://github.com/areenberg/MDPSolver Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss_paper Version: v0.9.7 Editor: !--editor-->@kellyrowland<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: !--reviewers-list-->@gartavanis<!--end-reviewers-list-- Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@gartavanis, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @kellyrowland know.
β¨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest β¨
Checklists
@gartavanis, please create your checklist typing:
@editorialbot generate my checklist