Open editorialbot opened 1 day ago
editorialbot
commented
1 day ago Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commandsFor example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdfSoftware report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.09 s (456.0 files/s, 292977.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG 5 0 0 17563
Python 16 616 1099 1929
Markdown 8 164 0 481
Jupyter Notebook 7 0 2882 479
TeX 1 39 0 381
TOML 1 4 0 30
YAML 1 1 0 19
Bourne Shell 1 5 5 5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 40 829 3986 20887
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Commit count by author:
51 Mudunuru, Maruti K
7 aramyxt
4 Aramy Truong
1 Maruti Kumar Mudunuru
1 mlmamudPaper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1383
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section
editorialbot
commented
1 day ago License info:
🟡 License found: Other (Check here for OSI approval)
editorialbot
commented
1 day ago Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.1016/0167-1987(84)90005-9 is OK
- 10.1128/msystems.00913-22 is OK
- 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2017.10.012 is OK
- 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105921 is OK
- 10.1016/j.still.2018.04.017 is OK
- 10.1016/j.still.2019.104567 is OK
- 10.1890/10-2246.1 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2016.49 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01296 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-018-0463-x is OK
- 10.2136/vzj2011.0185 is OK
- 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.002 is OK
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146572 is OK
- 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115170 is OK
- 10.1016/j.still.2018.01.001 is OK
- 10.1128/aem.54.6.1472-1480.1988 is OK
- 10.1016/j.still.2020.104855 is OK
- 10.3390/ijerph191710582 is OK
- 10.1007/s11242-009-9412-3 is OK
- 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115674 is OK
- 10.1038/s41467-017-01320-x is OK
- 10.1002/jeq2.20256 is OK
- 10.1029/2003GB002041 is OK
- 10.1071/WF15037 is OK
- 10.1007/s11104-012-1470-6 is OK
- 10.3390/soilsystems2040066 is OK
- 10.1111/gcb.15365 is OK
- 10.1007/s11242-022-01852-x is OK
- 10.1007/s10596-014-9424-0 is OK
- 10.1117/12.2611234 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.03764 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Microfluidic model porous media: Fabrication and a...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The D ual A rrhenius and M ichaelis–M enten kineti...
❌ MISSING DOIs
- 10.2136/vzj2011.0072 may be a valid DOI for title: A review of micromodels and their use in two-phase...
- 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.04.071 may be a valid DOI for title: Fluid–rock interactions and its implications on EO...
- 10.1021/acs.est.1c03899.s001 may be a valid DOI for title: Microfluidics as an emerging platform for explorin...
- 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111517 may be a valid DOI for title: Development of glass-based microfluidic devices: A...
- 10.1029/2009wr008424 may be a valid DOI for title: Excluded-volume expansion of Archie’s law for gas ...
- 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.11.025 may be a valid DOI for title: Differences in soluble organic carbon chemistry in...
- 10.5194/bg-15-5031-2018 may be a valid DOI for title: Diffusion limitations and Michaelis–Menten kinetic...
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
editorialbot
commented
1 day ago Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
PXO (Poly-XTAL Operations): MATLAB Codebase to Generate, Analyse and Export Complex 2D Spatio-Temporally Gradient Grain Structures
Submitting author: @SunilAnandatheertha
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @yangbai90, @ksyang2013, @littlelazy6
Similarity score: 0.7291
Nanomesh: A Python workflow tool for generating meshes from image data
Submitting author: @stefsmeets
Handling editor: @prashjha (Active)
Reviewers: @jameshgrn, @vijaysm
Similarity score: 0.6997
TauFactor 2: A GPU accelerated python tool for microstructural analysis
Submitting author: @stke9
Handling editor: @zhubonan (Active)
Reviewers: @alexsquires, @ma-sadeghi
Similarity score: 0.6946
PiSCAT: A Python Package for Interferometric Scattering Microscopy
Submitting author: @po60nani
Handling editor: @emdupre (Active)
Reviewers: @ziatdinovmax, @aquilesC
Similarity score: 0.6919
PyLithics: A Python package for stone tool analysis
Submitting author: @JasonGellis
Handling editor: @Nikoleta-v3 (Active)
Reviewers: @MichaelHoltonPrice, @steko
Similarity score: 0.6913
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
kthyng
commented
1 day ago Hi @aramyxt and thanks for your submission! I am looking for some specific items to make sure your submission fits our requirements at a high level (not at the more detailed review level) before moving on to finding an editor or putting this on our waitlist if no relevant editors are available. I'll comment over time as I have a chance to go through them:
In the meantime, please take a look at the comments above ⬆️ from the editorialbot to address any DOI, license, or paper issues if you're able (there may not be any), or suggest reviewers. For reviewers, please suggest 5 reviewers from the database listed above or your own (non-conflicted) extended network. Their github handles are most useful to receive but please don't use "@" to reference them since it will prematurely ping them.
kthyng
commented
1 day ago @aramyxt I consulted with a license expert from our editorial team about your license and was told:
It's not an OSI-approved license. It's a mash-up, borrowing phrases from different licenses with unclear implications on compatibility. It could be submitted to OSI for approval, but I expect it would be declined since that would contribute to license proliferation without adding clarity or semantic value.
Note that having an OSI-approved license is a requirement for JOSS to review your submission.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@aramyxt<!--end-author-handle-- (Aramy Truong) Repository: https://github.com/EMSL-Computing/Pore2Chip Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 0.1.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @aramyxt. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@aramyxt if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: