Closed whedon closed 6 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks. @nhejazi it looks like you're currently assigned as the reviewer for this paper :tada:.
:star: Important :star:
If you haven't already, you should seriously consider unsubscribing from GitHub notifications for this (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews) repository. As a reviewer, you're probably currently watching this repository which means for GitHub's default behaviour you will receive notifications (emails) for all reviews 😿
To fix this do the following two things:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
I've now completed a preliminary review of the iml
R package -- @christophM, this looks really great! There are just a few outstanding items that require your attention before I can check off the remaining items required for the JOSS review. Please take a look at the two issues (on examples and on licensing/contributions) that provide specific details on what needs to be addressed. Feel free to let me know if I can provide any further information that might be helpful in completing this review.
@nhejazi Thank you for the very fast review!
@christophM Please address these issues when you get a chance and let me know when they're complete.
@nhejazi thank you for the review!
@leeper, @nhejazi I adressed and closed the issues (I was not sure whether to leave them open or close them. feel free to re-open if something is missing).
Great. @nhejazi Can you take another look and let me know about any new or continuing concerns?
Everything looks good to me! I've checked off the remaining review items.
Thanks, @nhejazi!
@christophM The review process is now complete. To finalize your submission and accept your paper in JOSS, we need two things. First, can you confirm that all references in your bibliography have a DOI (if one exists). It looks like a few of those papers should have DOIs.
Second, we need you to deposit a copy of your software repository (including any revisions made during the JOSS review process) with a data-archiving service. To do so:
I went through the references and updated the DOIs, wherever I found one.
@whedon commands
Here are some things you can ask me to do:
# List all of Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands
# Assign a GitHub user as the sole reviewer of this submission
@whedon assign @username as reviewer
# Add a GitHub user to the reviewers of this submission
@whedon add @username as reviewer
# Remove a GitHub user from the reviewers of this submission
@whedon remove @username as reviewer
# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors
# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers
# Change editorial assignment
@whedon assign @username as editor
# Set the software archive DOI at the top of the issue e.g.
@whedon set 10.0000/zenodo.00000 as archive
# Open the review issue
@whedon start review
🚧 🚧 🚧 Experimental Whedon features 🚧 🚧 🚧
# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf
@whedon generate pdf
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
Here is the DOI:
@whedon set 10.5281/zenodo.1299059 as archive
OK. 10.5281/zenodo.1299059 is the archive.
@arfon over to you
@nhejazi - many thanks for your review here and to @leeper for editing this submission ✨
@christophM - your paper is now accepted into JOSS and your DOI is https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00786 :zap: :rocket: :boom:
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippet:
[![DOI](http://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.00786/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00786)
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
@arfon @nhejazi @leeper Thanks for the smooth and pleasant process!
Hi @arfon, I just talked to @leeper about the possibilty to add an author to the paper after publishing. When I wrote the paper, I (falsely) assumed that only code contributors can be authors.
It would be really great if I could update the paper with authors that also contributed conceptually.
@leeper mentioned that it might be possible. @arfon is it possible to update the list of authors?
Thanks for your efforts!
@arfon is it possible to update the list of authors?
Yes, please update the paper.md
in your master
branch of the repository and give me a shout when you've done so.
Thanks @arfon.
I updated the paper.md
in the master
. Let me know if there are any more actions I have to take.
I updated the paper.md in the master. Let me know if there are any more actions I have to take.
👍 this should be updated on the JOSS site now. It can take a few hours to update due to caching.
Great, thanks a lot!
Submitting author: @christophM (Christoph Molnar) Repository: https://github.com/christophM/iml Version: v0.5.2 Editor: @leeper Reviewer: @nhejazi Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.1299059
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@nhejazi, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.theoj.org/about#reviewer_guidelines. Any questions/concerns please let @leeper know.
Review checklist for @nhejazi
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?