[PRE REVIEW]: 'tidynamics: A tiny package to compute the dynamics of stochastic and molecular simulations

[whedon]

Submitting author: @pdebuyl (Pierre de Buyl) Repository: https://github.com/pdebuyl-lab/tidynamics Version: 0.1.2 Editor: @kyleniemeyer Reviewers: @richardjgowers, @malramsay64

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @pdebuyl. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@pdebuyl if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

[arfon]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

--> Check article proof :page_facing_up: <--

[pdebuyl]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

--> Check article proof :page_facing_up: <--

[pdebuyl]

From the list of reviewers, I can suggest:

• @tacaswell
• @richardjgowers
• @ha0ye
• @malramsay64

If this is not asking too much, can we ask whedon to pick another citation style? See issue https://github.com/openjournals/whedon/issues/2

[pdebuyl]

@arfon Is there anything else needed from my part for the review to start?

[richardjgowers]

I’m happy to review this, or is it for the editor to pick?

[arfon]

@arfon Is there anything else needed from my part for the review to start?

@pdebuyl - we're waiting for an editor to pick up this submission first. Sorry for the delay, there have been a bunch of submissions recently and we're a little backed up.

[pdebuyl]

@arfon thank you for the update. No worry with the delay, I understand editorial loads and the increase for JOSS just means more work from volunteers.

[arfon]

:wave: @kyleniemeyer - would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

[kyleniemeyer]

@arfon ok, can do.

[kyleniemeyer]

@whedon assign @kyleniemeyer as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @kyleniemeyer

[kyleniemeyer]

@whedon add @richardjgowers as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @richardjgowers is now a reviewer

[kyleniemeyer]

@fdroessler @malramsay64 @keipertk would any one of you be willing to provide a second review?

[malramsay64]

I would be happy to provide a second review.

[fdroessler]

Happy as well but @malramsay64 was first so happy for him to do it.

[kyleniemeyer]

Thanks to both of you!

[kyleniemeyer]

@whedon add @malramsay64 as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @malramsay64 is now a reviewer

[kyleniemeyer]

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/877. Feel free to close this issue now!

[kyleniemeyer]

OK @pdebuyl @richardjgowers @malramsay64 we will have the actual review over in issue #877