[PRE REVIEW]: SALib: An open-source Python library for Sensitivity Analysis

[whedon]

Submitting author: jdherman (Jonathan Herman) Repository: https://github.com/SALib/SALib Version: v1.0.0 Editor: @kyleniemeyer Reviewer: @stijnvanhoey

What this issue is for

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS jdherman. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks for JOSS. @kyleniemeyer it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper :tada:

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

[arfon]

👋 @kyleniemeyer thanks for agreeing to edit this one 💖

[kyleniemeyer]

Hi @bryanwweber any interest in reviewing this?

Also, @jdherman if you have any potential reviewers you could suggest (i.e., closer to the domain), that would be great. I usually like to have two reviewers.

[jdherman]

Thanks @kyleniemeyer. For reviewers, you might try asking @quaquel or @stijnvanhoey if they are available.

[kyleniemeyer]

Ah great, thank you. @quaquel or @stijnvanhoey, would either of you be interested in reviewing this for JOSS? I will also be getting an existing JOSS reviewer that is not necessarily close to the relevant domain.

[kyleniemeyer]

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List all of Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# Assign a GitHub user as the reviewer of this submission
@whedon assign @username as reviewer

# List the GitHub usernames of the JOSS editors
@whedon list editors

# List of JOSS reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

# Change editorial assignment
@whedon assign @username as editor

# Set the software archive DOI at the top of the issue e.g.
@whedon set 10.0000/zenodo.00000 as archive

# Open the review issue
@whedon start review

:construction: Important :construction:

This is all quite new. Please make sure you check the top of the issue after running a @whedon command (you might also need to refresh the page to see the issue update).

[kyleniemeyer]

@whedon list reviewers

[whedon]

Here's the current list of JOSS reviewers: https://github.com/openjournals/joss/blob/master/docs/reviewers.csv

[kyleniemeyer]

Hi @khinsen @nirum @amoeba @jordigh would any of you be willing to review this? If so, you can respond with a 👋 (otherwise ignore). Thanks!

[stijnvanhoey]

Hi @kyleniemeyer, I'm willing to review the SALIB contribution.

[kyleniemeyer]

Great @stijnvanhoey thanks!

@whedon assign @stijnvanhoey as reviewer

[quaquel]

'll be happy to help as well

[kyleniemeyer]

@whedon assign @stijnvanhoey as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @stijnvanhoey

[kyleniemeyer]

Hi @quaquel thanks, your additional review would be great. As soon as @whedon kicks into gear, a new issue for the review itself will be created.

[kyleniemeyer]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

You didn't say the magic word! Try this:

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[kyleniemeyer]

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/97. Feel free to close this issue now!

[kyleniemeyer]

Alright, thanks @stijnvanhoey and @quaquel for agreeing to review! (Any of the others I pinged: you are welcome to contribute as well if you have the bandwidth.)

The review itself will take place in #97; if you haven't reviewed for JOSS before, please check out the reviewer guidelines: http://joss.theoj.org/about#reviewer_guidelines

Thanks again!