ljharb
commented
15 hours ago nvm's threat model, per request: https://github.com/nvm-sh/nvm/blob/HEAD/.github/THREAT_MODEL.md
The advantage of having a threat model is that you're able to clearly decide whether something is a security issue or not, which relieves maintenance burden for the things that aren't.
Stealing shamelessly from AB Chair Wendy Reid's message to the Advisory Committee, here's what we could express an opinion on if we wish:
Sustainable Web Interest Group Charter Reply by: October 16, 2024 (23:59 Boston Time) Summary: In response to suggestions made during the AC review of a proposed Sustainable Web Working Group Charter, the staff is re-proposing an Interest Group. This is a call for review of a proposed Sustainable Web Interest Group Charter. Link to Charter: https://www.w3.org/2024/09/sustyweb-charter-202409.html Link to Questionnaire: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/SustyWeb/
Based on guidance at the last Collab Space call, I have voted Supports this charter as-is. I can change it if anyone strongly disagrees. (But there is no disagreement I'm aware of among W3C members).
Security Interest Group Charter Proposed Changes Reply by: October 19, 2024 (23:59 Boston Time) Summary: Following the AC Review, we are proposing the following substantial change: Adding the “Threat Model for the Web” deliverable. Link to Charter: https://www.w3.org/2024/04/proposed-wg-webappsec.html Link to Questionnaire: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/sing-tmw/ There's some disagreement I don't understand, on procedural grounds. I'll vote if anyone thinks it's important for our community
Vibration API (Second Edition) as Obsolete Recommendation Reply by: November 5, 2024 (23:59 Boston Time) Summary: The reason for this proposal is that this specification no longer has multiple implementations on the Web platform. The W3C needs to communicate this as clearly as possible to the Web community. Link to Questionnaire: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/obsolete-vibration-api/ See https://github.com/openjs-foundation/standards/issues/303
WebRTC: Real-time Communication in Browsers Proposed Amendments Reply by: December 8, 2024 (23:59 Boston Time) Summary: A list of proposed amendments can be found here: https://www.w3.org/TR/2024/REC-webrtc-20241008/Overview.html#proposed-amendments Link to document: https://www.w3.org/TR/2024/REC-webrtc-20241008/ Link to Questionnaire: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/webrtc-2024-amendments/
WebRTC makes my head hurt ;-) .. seeking opinions on this and whether we should take a stand on them in the ballot
Call for Nominations: Technical Architecture Group (TAG) Reply by: November 5, 2024 (23:59 Boston Time) AC representatives are invited to nominate candidates for the upcoming TAG election. There are 4 seats up for election. The terms will run from February 1, 2025 to January 31, 2027. Link to nomination form: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/tag-202410/
We have supported @LeaVerou for two terms now, I don't know if she is interested in being nominated again. Let's discuss what she wants and whether we have another candidate if she plans to get on with life after the TAG