Closed bobjacobsen closed 7 months ago
@dpharris When you get a chance, could you merge this one (and ideally #244 and #246) and then create a new 0.7.34 release of this? Thank you! That'll solve a problem that's been seen by Andrew Crosland when he tries to run under NetBeans.
Bob -
Will do it later today.
David
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 6:43 AM Bob Jacobsen @.***> wrote:
@dpharris https://github.com/dpharris When you get a chance, could you merge this one (and ideally #244 https://github.com/openlcb/OpenLCB_Java/pull/244 and #246 https://github.com/openlcb/OpenLCB_Java/pull/246) and then create a new 0.7.34 release of this? Thank you! That'll solve a problem that's been seen by Andrew Crosland https://jmri-developers.groups.io/g/jmri/message/9872 when he tries to run under NetBeans.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openlcb/OpenLCB_Java/pull/245#issuecomment-1952592917, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEDQSRK7RKDVRXBBNP7DB3YUNQHJAVCNFSM6AAAAABDHFVL4GVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNJSGU4TEOJRG4 . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
This adds support for the Verify Node Addressed message.
As part of that, it renames the various internal references to VerifyNode to be VerifyNodeGlobal
Also armors against AMR messages that don't have a Node ID as content. The Standard says this is required, but some nodes don't send it in response to a collision.