Open bakerstu opened 1 year ago
I think this is progress, but there's likely to be concern that simple protection circuits will need some time to limit a short to 1A or below, hence be above 1A for a little while.
Since the goal is to protect the UTP and connectors from heating, perhaps add a time specification? "limit supplied current above 1A to no more than (nnnn) msec"? The time can be taken, with some margin, from typical protection-component data sheets.
A slightly safer approach would be to put the ultimate current limit at twice the specified maximum current, but I think that's not really needed: Most of the supply nodes are going to supply 500mA anyway.
PTC's are usually specified to trip after 8 seconds of overload at 2x the rated current.
So this addendum will surely not be in the milliseconds range.
Currently, the CAN Physical standard states:
This could be interpreted, as written, that 500mA is a hard limit. In this case, using a PTC would mean that a device could not ever practically sized to guarantee supply of 500mA since PTCs can have a lot of variability in their trip points.
I suggest a minor tweak to make the wording more obviously PTC friendly:
Additional discussion can be found here: https://groups.io/g/layoutcommandcontrol/topic/standards_compliance/99496160 https://groups.io/g/openlcb/topic/testing_current_compliance/99507345