openlegend / core-rules

Source text / code for Open Legend RPG
http://www.openlegendrpg.com/
Other
90 stars 56 forks source link

Knockdown #473

Closed BuildAndDie closed 7 years ago

BuildAndDie commented 7 years ago

Knockdown is incorrect on the github, but correct on the website.

Here:

https://github.com/openlegend/core-rules/blob/master/banes/banes.yml

it shows it as the old, incorrect way of giving advantage or disadvantage. However the website is currently displaying the information correct by adjusting the guard score.

jcte02 commented 7 years ago

I don't know what you're hinting to, but this is knockdown's effect in the link you pointed:

The target falls prone. Prone targets have disadvantage 1 on all attacks they make. Characters that are prone due to the knockdown bane (or any other reason) get +2 to Guard versus Ranged attacks and -2 Guard versus Melee attacks. Standing up from prone requires a move action and costs a character half (round down) of their speed for the round.

and this is directly from the site:

The target falls prone. Prone targets have disadvantage 1 on all attacks they make. Characters that are prone due to the knockdown bane (or any other reason) get +2 to Guard versus Ranged attacks and -2 Guard versus Melee attacks. Standing up from prone requires a move action and costs a character half (round down) of their speed for the round.

I see no differences. Were you perhaps referencing an outdated version of the banes.yml file?

BuildAndDie commented 7 years ago

Strange.... I guess someone else was referencing an outdated version.... Yeah it is the same.

jcte02 commented 7 years ago

They were referencing the print-edition branch:

The target falls prone. Prone targets have disadvantage 1 on all attacks they make. Melee and area attacks against prone characters gain advantage 1. Projectile attacks against prone targets suffer disadvantage 1. Standing up from prone requires a move action and costs a character half (round down) of their speed for the round.

This is strange, as the master branch is the default branch for this Github repository. This means that whoever reported this issue had to manually switch to the print-edition branch.

BuildAndDie commented 7 years ago

actually they weren't referencing the print-edition branch, they were apparently referencing their own version of github that hadn't forked/pulled from this github in 4 months and use a bot to read out the info to them in discord or some such.

jcte02 commented 7 years ago

lol top tier git magiks