openmainframeproject / wg-modernization

Modernization WG
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
6 stars 4 forks source link

Create modernization-definition.md #6

Closed ijmitch closed 1 year ago

ijmitch commented 1 year ago

I added the initial paragraphs to modernization-definition.md but was unsure whether the other pieces should fit in the same place.

From the Word doc...


Setup:

Scope:

rpomp commented 1 year ago

To be clear, above is original OUTLINE version, not what was in word doc #4

See below: Objective: Define the term mainframe modernization for use in the OMP Working Group

Defining Paragraph:

Businesses are digitally transforming to better serve their customers, reduce time to market, and increase their ability to respond quickly to market changes, consumer behavior, and new regulations. As businesses transform, they are imposing significant demands on existing mainframe applications and data, driving the need for modernization to better achieve business outcomes.

It’s often not a question of if you need to modernize mainframe applications, only a question of how. The OMP Working Group embraces a hybrid cloud approach to mainframe modernization with the goal of helping business improve business agility, optimize costs, achieve non-functional requirements, while leveraging existing investments. We will provide a framework for modernization that spans applications, data, operations, interoperability, and security. We encourage looking at the business needs first, then take an ROI driven approach to help assess costs, business risks, and tradeoffs. There is rarely a “one-size fits all” approach to anything in the IT industry. By providing a framework we intend to feature the range of options available to help you to achieve your mainframe modernization objectives.

ijmitch commented 1 year ago

@rpomp - yes, and the two paras in the comment above are what are in the commit of a new file called modernizationp-definition.md in the branch associated with this PR.

I only included the bulleted list in the initial comment of this PR both for the historic record and to see if anyone was going to suggest a further change to the two paragraphs.

So I think the PR (or more precisely the commit to the branch it's proposing to merge) is aligned to your intent.

ijmitch commented 1 year ago

you can see the file which is proposed https://github.com/openmainframeproject/wg-modernization/blob/add-definition-proposal/modernization-definition.md or click on the Files changed tab at the top of this thread.

rpomp commented 1 year ago

I did miss the call, however I was given a quick debrief. I now understand @ijmitch why you posted the First Principles. This is what the team agreed to. Before we modify any definition, we need to go back to the Principles. Also, at what point does this get locked down?

ijmitch commented 1 year ago

at what point does this get locked down?

Well, we can discuss here and iterate on improvements via commits to the branch until we decide to merge the branch into main which would signal that we're happy with it.

rpomp commented 1 year ago

ok

b-around commented 1 year ago

Sharing some ideas that I think should be in our definition of modernization which probably should be split into two parts – what we understand as modernization and how we will address modernization

OUR PERCEPTION OF MODERNIZATION CONTEXT • Modernization is about enabling continuous evolution of business operations (products, services, process) in line with a company mission and customer needs • Modernization is enabled by technology changes (apps, data, platforms, infrastructure, Dev & Ops tooling) and organizational changes (structure, culture, ways of working, alignment of priorities) • Mainframe platforms typically support business critical operations and due to its historical criticality and longevity, not always have been through holistic or consistent approaches to modernization • The above sometimes leads to an incorrect view that the only option for modernizing areas that depend on mainframe is the replacement of the platform

OUR WE WILL ADDRESS MODERNIZATION DEFINITION AND OUR BOUNDARIES • The OMP Working Group aims to provide a clear articulation of options, principles and patterns for mainframe platforms modernization in the form of a framework that guides the modernization of technology components and organizational practices around mainframes • The framework considers business needs, business value & ROI, execution risks & trade-offs, technology options & organizational impact • The framework is not tied to specific mainframe platforms, vendor technologies, tools, or target states and rather focus on the approach, execution process and required capabilities • Because organizational context matters and "one-size fits all" approaches don’t exist, thus the framework, parameters and considerations should always be adjusted to a company reality

b-around commented 1 year ago

Sharing some ideas that I think should be in our definition of modernization which probably should be split into two parts – what we understand as modernization and how we will address modernization

OUR PERCEPTION OF MODERNIZATION CONTEXT • Modernization is about enabling continuous evolution of business operations (products, services, process) in line with a company mission and customer needs • Modernization is enabled by technology changes (apps, data, platforms, infrastructure, Dev & Ops tooling) and organizational changes (structure, culture, ways of working, alignment of priorities) • Mainframe platforms typically support business critical operations and due to its historical criticality and longevity, not always have been through holistic or consistent approaches to modernization • The above sometimes leads to an incorrect view that the only option for modernizing areas that depend on mainframe is the replacement of the platform

OUR WE WILL ADDRESS MODERNIZATION DEFINITION AND OUR BOUNDARIES • The OMP Working Group aims to provide a clear articulation of options, principles and patterns for mainframe platforms modernization in the form of a framework that guides the modernization of technology components and organizational practices around mainframes • The framework considers business needs, business value & ROI, execution risks & trade-offs, technology options & organizational impact • The framework is not tied to specific mainframe platforms, vendor technologies, tools, or target states and rather focus on the approach, execution process and required capabilities • Because organizational context matters and "one-size fits all" approaches don’t exist, thus the framework, parameters and considerations should always be adjusted to a company reality

rpomp commented 1 year ago

@b-around this is consistent with our First Principles that @ijmitch posted initially. I am fine with this direction.

ijmitch commented 1 year ago

OK, from a process point of view I'm going to progress this PR from being DRAFT so we can merge the current proposal and move on to further PRs to improve/refine it.

ijmitch commented 1 year ago

For those just coming to Github, comments can be made on the specific proposal in this PR as illustrated in this screenshot... image

ijmitch commented 1 year ago

@MistyDecker I recommend that you approve this PR so it can be merged and we move on with refining it in further more specific PRs.