Closed travisdowns closed 6 months ago
Yes, it does make a lot of sense to make that improvement. The current logic, was to try to keep producer/consumers separated to make it easier to implement, although it's not really the best strategy.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed after 5 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Currently if you specify a "no consume" workload (e.g., with 0 subscriptions per topic) it will still allocate 1/2 (rounded up) of all worker nodes to consumer workers, even though consumers will not be started.
Instead, we should allocate all nodes to producers.