Discussion items about the paper

The same holds for other repositories, such as LIBSVM (Chang and Lin, 2011)

If we only can give a single other repository as an example, we maybe shouldn't say other repositorios?

However, none of the above tools allows to add new datasets or easily share and compare benchmarking results online.

PMLB would allow for pull requests to the github repository. Not sure how to write this in the paper, though.

Also, I just realized that in the pseudocodes the API key is located at a rather weird place. I'll change this if you agree on this.
Maybe we can actually reduce the space between the references instead of making formatting changes to the main paper, what do you think?

openml / benchmark-suites