Closed eddiebergman closed 6 months ago
Hi @josvandervelde,
Just pinging this issue again. I reran the tests to see where it fails which you can find here: https://github.com/openml/openml-python/actions/runs/7527320791
If you need to run them manually, you can do so from Actions -> Test -> Run Workflow
. Otherwise, committing to this branch will also trigger them :)
They seemed to pass, I'm going to try create an empty commit to have it display here
Attention: 3 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
b06ecee
) 38.26% compared to head (64df490
) 84.19%. Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.:exclamation: Current head 64df490 differs from pull request most recent head 96b72dc. Consider uploading reports for the commit 96b72dc to get more accurate results
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
openml/_api_calls.py | 0.00% | 3 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Seems the only issue was uploading the code coverage with a server error, otherwise this seems all good now :)
Hi @LennartPurucker you still have a blocking review here. are you ok with a merge?
Yup, sorry, this is fine to merge now. And we can do a release afterwards @eddiebergman
Closes: #1304
Branch by @PGijsbers, just created a PR from it
Previously, each dataset had their own bucket: https://openml1.win.tue.nl/datasets61/dataset_61.pq
But we were advised to reduce the amount of buckets and favor hosting many objects in hierarchical structure, so we now have instead some prefixes to divide up the dataset objects into separate subdirectories:
https://openml1.win.tue.nl/datasets/0000/0061/dataset_61.pq
This commit has bypassed pre-commit. Tests should be updated too.
Reference Issue
What does this PR implement/fix? Explain your changes.
How should this PR be tested?
Any other comments?