I was hoping this would also fix #154, but that file contains additional issues that pretty much make it impossible to correctly identify the missing residues without reading the REMARK sections. For example, chain L skips directly from residue 94 to 96, but does not consider there to be a missing residue in between them.
This fixes the issue described in https://github.com/pandegroup/pdbfixer/issues/170#issuecomment-511239668. It now handles that file correctly.
I was hoping this would also fix #154, but that file contains additional issues that pretty much make it impossible to correctly identify the missing residues without reading the REMARK sections. For example, chain L skips directly from residue 94 to 96, but does not consider there to be a missing residue in between them.