Closed FedericoV closed 3 years ago
thanks for the contribution!
Ooops, yes, typo.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:10 AM Fabian Pedregosa notifications@github.com wrote:
@fabianp commented on this pull request.
In copt/splitting.py https://github.com/openopt/copt/pull/78#discussion_r461701763:
@@ -99,29 +102,29 @@ def minimize_three_split(
if prox_1 is None:
- def prox_1(x, s):
- def prox_1(x, s, args):
why not *args as in prox_2? is it a typo?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openopt/copt/pull/78#pullrequestreview-456791262, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEZ25SBEMINIUF2AAJ5EA3R53Z7NANCNFSM4PJ65ABQ .
great, fixed and merged
Fixed the documentation for minimize_three_split. There are still a few very minor issues: the verbose flag is currently not used anywhere in the function, and ls_tol on line 149 is potentially unbound - I don't think this is likely reachable in practice though.