We'd like to make the standard documentation feel more like an OpenOwnership product and less standalone. I believe the intention originally was to maintain and project its independence, but the current belief is that this is more detrimental to the use of the standard than a benefit.
Practically, this looks like:
[x] Using the standard fonts for headings (Publico Headline) and body text (Atlas Grotesk) and the same sizes (tba)
[x] Using the brand colour (#3d30d4) for links in body text, primary calls to action and highlights
[x] Using the OO favicon
[x] Adding some (presumably small) form of the OO logo to the header, and the main logo to the homepage (somewhere, tba)
[x] Styling the navigation to approximate the main navigation of openownership.org (black background, white links, brand colour underline on active pages
[x] Updating the body and copy to be the same 'black' on 'white' (or 'light grey') as openownership.org (exact colours from the styleguide, tba)
We'd like to make the standard documentation feel more like an OpenOwnership product and less standalone. I believe the intention originally was to maintain and project its independence, but the current belief is that this is more detrimental to the use of the standard than a benefit.
Practically, this looks like: