I've been looking at/working with the 02_weather.Rmd file and have some questions about it.
It has duplicate code in some places, and/or just doesn't run and it only has weather for a few locations, not all.
So, is this really necessary for our meta-analysis? I can't see what it really adds at this point and appears to have several issues in it's current form. If there's a clear reason for us to use it, I have some existing code for climograms that can clean it up and improve the figures, but I'm not convinced it's necessary to have for this work.
I've been looking at/working with the 02_weather.Rmd file and have some questions about it.
It has duplicate code in some places, and/or just doesn't run and it only has weather for a few locations, not all.
So, is this really necessary for our meta-analysis? I can't see what it really adds at this point and appears to have several issues in it's current form. If there's a clear reason for us to use it, I have some existing code for climograms that can clean it up and improve the figures, but I'm not convinced it's necessary to have for this work.