updated the living wage figure (outside London) (added to no tax on tampons, other hygiene products)

[LudovicD]

• updated the living wage figure (from outside London, living wage fondation) (also added mention of London figure, hour & year)
• added to no tax on tampons, other basic hygiene products (in the interest of hygiene in the whole society)

[openpolitics-bot]

This proposal is open for discussion and voting. If you are a contributor to this repository (and not the proposer), you may vote on whether or not it is accepted.

How to vote

Vote by entering one of the following symbols in a comment on this pull request. Only your last vote will be counted, and you may change your vote at any time until the change is accepted or closed.

vote	symbol	type this	points
Yes	:white_check_mark:	:white_check_mark:	1
No	:negative_squared_cross_mark:	:negative_squared_cross_mark:	-1
Abstain	:zipper_mouth_face:	:zipper_mouth_face:	0
Block	:no_entry_sign:	:no_entry_sign:	-1000

Proposals will be accepted and merged once they have a total of 2 points when all votes are counted. Votes will be open for a minimum of 7 days, but will be closed if the proposal is not accepted after 90.

Votes are counted automatically here, and results are set in the merge status checks below.

Changes

@LudovicD, if you want to make further changes to this proposal, you can do so by clicking on the pencil icons here. If a change is made to the proposal, no votes cast before that change will be counted, and votes must be recast.

[Floppy]

Thanks for updating the figures! There's nothing here I disagree with, but could I ask you to separate it into separate proposals? There's a couple of bits to discuss in each, that I think would be worth doing separately.

[LudovicD]

How do i separate it now ? ( with this git hub, proposal, which is new to me ) (1. the figures, 2 the addition (of other hygiene products) to no tax on tampons 3 the ownership (man-made) ) ( i think the definition for me of the commons include all natural resources, so Land, that are not human-made, which is why the logical way of specifying ownership as private is to be explicit with qualifying the something to be bought-sold [->transfered to private ownership] as human-made ).

[Floppy]

Best way is to go back to the page you edited and do a new suggestion, one for each separate part. Then we can close this one. Does that make sense?

[LudovicD]

yes, a bit the long way, but i will do that.

[LudovicD]

done, split, so when the 3 are seen available for vote, we could close this one.

[Floppy]

Thanks, this is now split into #560 #559 and #558. Closing this one early :)