openpolitics / manifesto

A collaborative political manifesto
http://openpolitics.org.uk/manifesto
Other
100 stars 99 forks source link

War on Weapons #601

Closed Xyleneb closed 7 years ago

Xyleneb commented 7 years ago

The ban on old ladies carrying anything to defend themselves with is a joke. The rest of this stuff is so arbitrary and ineffective that I doubt if it ever saved anybody from being victimised.

How many hand-claw stabbings (either pre or post-1997) have you seen on your block?

openpolitics-bot commented 7 years ago

This proposal is open for discussion and voting. If you are a contributor to this repository (and not the proposer), you may vote on whether or not it is accepted.

How to vote

Vote by entering one of the following symbols in a comment on this pull request. Only your last vote will be counted, and you may change your vote at any time until the change is accepted or closed.

vote symbol type this points
Yes :white_check_mark: :white_check_mark: 1
No :negative_squared_cross_mark: :negative_squared_cross_mark: -1
Abstain :zipper_mouth_face: :zipper_mouth_face: 0
Block :no_entry_sign: :no_entry_sign: -1000

Proposals will be accepted and merged once they have a total of 2 points when all votes are counted. Votes will be open for a minimum of 7 days, but will be closed if the proposal is not accepted after 90.

Votes are counted automatically here, and results are set in the merge status checks below.

Changes

@Xyleneb, if you want to make further changes to this proposal, you can do so by clicking on the pencil icons here. If a change is made to the proposal, no votes cast before that change will be counted, and votes must be recast.

Floppy commented 7 years ago

This doesn't sit right with me and I'll need some serious convincing. Honestly, I don't think people should be carrying weapons around at all. I'm definitely going to need some evidence on how weapon restrictions don't keep people any safer before considering an upvote on policy to remove them.

Vote: ❎

Xyleneb commented 7 years ago

First of all, I think that you're already aware that we've banned everything. You name it, we've banned it. What I think you want to know is; under what metric has that ban worked?

Availability;- Pepper spray has been banned since 1968. Technically, the ban covers every spray bottle as an offense under the firearms act. Yes, every spray bottle so long as it's "noxious". Is it less available? Not really. The independent seems to think they're available.

Manufacture;- Ground chilli and surgical spirit. In a spray bottle. Call it hot sauce, call it a dangerous firearm... or let a jury interpret it for you.

Marketing;- Yes, marketing is banned too. The words "zombie", "military", "tactical" and "special ops" are UK no-nos. In someone's head in an office somewhere, this stopped a crime from happening.

UK retailers can be threatened or fined for not keeping ahead of all of this. German retailers - not so much.

Safety;- The point that you're going to pull this policy on. Well, you'd think that knifecrimes.org would be openly partisan on a topic like this, but even they provide a nice summary of how throwing legislation at the problem hasn't made it go away.

I used to hold the same view as them too, namely that I would be willing to inconvenience a hell of a lot of people to not have to find out what it feels like to get stabbed in the spleen. "Throw them in jail", "make them carry a license" etc etc. But in the end, I remember a conversation I once had that went along the lines of; "Would you be content to live in a zoo where you are safe but not free?"

The answer to that, is that you can put no price on your liberty.

Regulations that are not demonstrably a necessity should be abolished. The burden of proof should fall to those who claim that these laws, are laws that we can't live without.

philipjohn commented 7 years ago

Likewise, I'm going to need to see some evidence that;

1) the current legislation does not adequately prevent violent crime 2) there are other ways to deal with the problem that work elsewhere in the world 3) that those other ways could feasibly work here

Vote: ❎

openpolitics-bot commented 7 years ago

Closed automatically: maximum age exceeded. Please feel free to resubmit this as a new proposal, but remember you will need to base any new proposal on the current policy text.