Closed simonneb closed 7 years ago
This proposal is open for discussion and voting. If you are a contributor to this repository (and not the proposer), you may vote on whether or not it is accepted.
Vote by entering one of the following symbols in a comment on this pull request. Only your last vote will be counted, and you may change your vote at any time until the change is accepted or closed.
vote | symbol | type this | points |
---|---|---|---|
Yes | :white_check_mark: | :white_check_mark: |
1 |
No | :negative_squared_cross_mark: | :negative_squared_cross_mark: |
-1 |
Abstain | :zipper_mouth_face: | :zipper_mouth_face: |
0 |
Block | :no_entry_sign: | :no_entry_sign: |
-1000 |
Proposals will be accepted and merged once they have a total of 2 points when all votes are counted. Votes will be open for a minimum of 7 days, but will be closed if the proposal is not accepted after 90.
Votes are counted automatically here, and results are set in the merge status checks below.
@simonneb, if you want to make further changes to this proposal, you can do so by clicking on the pencil icons here. If a change is made to the proposal, no votes cast before that change will be counted, and votes must be recast.
This is in line with existing ideas of separating legislature and executive, and it could start with this. Might need adjusting to fit together with that policy, but I'm in favour of the idea.
Should it be "wants to become" though? Maybe just trigger byelection after leadership contests decide a new leader?
Interestingly, this would prevent me (any many other founders of small parties) ever standing for election again - should there be something to qualify this in major parties only?
If your party thinks that they can do both, then why not let them try to do both? Better representation is what's in it for me apparently, but I kinda like how they're expected to prove their worth by being electable somewhere. I can't see there being much to gain from forbidding it.
I don't see the issue with a party leader also representing constituents, since the constituents did infact vote for said leader. Them being leader doesn't erase that.
Vote: ❎
all good points,this needs some more finessing. i will retract and come back to it later.
Allows party leaders to focus on the role of leading their party and, if successfully elected, the role of PM. Constituents get a proper representative in the House of Commons also.