search

openpreserve / jhove

File validation and characterisation.
http://jhove.openpreservation.org
Other
171 stars 79 forks source link

jHove doesn't report on a couple of TIFF tags: #848

Closed perdrix52 closed 3 months ago

perdrix52 commented 1 year ago

Specifically: TIFFTAG_STRIPOFFSETS and TIFFTAGSTRIPBYTECOUNTS

AsTiffTagViewer does report them correctly ...

StripOffsets (3 Long): 514, 16771762, 33543010 StripByteCounts (3 Long): 16771248, 16771248, 2496960

Here's a dropbox link to a file that contains those tags.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/moe5rtp4wg1ra21/MasterOffset_ISO200%20-%20good.tif?dl=0

Thanks, David

carlwilson commented 1 year ago

Hi @perdrix52 this won't be part of the finalised 1.28 release but we will take a look at this when we're planning the 1.30 release over the summer.

perdrix52 commented 1 year ago

Thanks, David

tledoux commented 8 months ago

In fact, all these tags were correctly extracted and checked. However, they were all stored in the NisoMetadata part of the information (see https://www.loc.gov/standards/mix/). This information is displayed differently depending on the version of mix 0.2, 1.0, 2.0

Only the 0.2 version displayed this information. This version is quite outdated and the default is to display the 2.0 version.

So the correction is to add those properties to the normal ones of the images. There will be a duplication of the information is the case of 0.2 version.