add magic with reverse norm order

[scottgigante-immunai]

Reversing the order of sqrt and libnorm inexplicably improves performance. Adding this to MAGIC with explicit naming so users are aware that this is different from defaults.

[scottgigante-immunai]

Tests at https://tower.nf/orgs/openproblems-bio/workspaces/openproblems-bio/watch/MJO29wdT7zRgp

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Base: 94.78% // Head: 94.92% // Increases project coverage by +0.14% :tada:

Coverage data is based on head (e3db9fa) compared to base (3d8964a). Patch coverage: 99.35% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #797 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 94.78% 94.92% +0.14% ========================================== Files 155 157 +2 Lines 4163 4279 +116 Branches 215 227 +12 ========================================== + Hits 3946 4062 +116 Misses 142 142 Partials 75 75 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | unittests | `94.92% <99.35%> (+0.14%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openproblems-bio#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/openproblems-bio/openproblems/pull/797?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openproblems-bio) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [...oblems/data/Wagner\_2018\_zebrafish\_embryo\_CRISPR.py](https://codecov.io/gh/openproblems-bio/openproblems/pull/797?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openproblems-bio#diff-b3BlbnByb2JsZW1zL2RhdGEvV2FnbmVyXzIwMThfemVicmFmaXNoX2VtYnJ5b19DUklTUFIucHk=) | `0.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [openproblems/data/multimodal/citeseq.py](https://codecov.io/gh/openproblems-bio/openproblems/pull/797?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openproblems-bio#diff-b3BlbnByb2JsZW1zL2RhdGEvbXVsdGltb2RhbC9jaXRlc2VxLnB5) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [openproblems/data/tabula\_muris\_senis.py](https://codecov.io/gh/openproblems-bio/openproblems/pull/797?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openproblems-bio#diff-b3BlbnByb2JsZW1zL2RhdGEvdGFidWxhX211cmlzX3NlbmlzLnB5) | `83.11% <ø> (ø)` | | | [...ration/batch\_integration\_embed/metrics/cc\_score.py](https://codecov.io/gh/openproblems-bio/openproblems/pull/797?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openproblems-bio#diff-b3BlbnByb2JsZW1zL3Rhc2tzL19iYXRjaF9pbnRlZ3JhdGlvbi9iYXRjaF9pbnRlZ3JhdGlvbl9lbWJlZC9tZXRyaWNzL2NjX3Njb3JlLnB5) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [...n/batch\_integration\_embed/metrics/iso\_label\_sil.py](https://codecov.io/gh/openproblems-bio/openproblems/pull/797?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openproblems-bio#diff-b3BlbnByb2JsZW1zL3Rhc2tzL19iYXRjaF9pbnRlZ3JhdGlvbi9iYXRjaF9pbnRlZ3JhdGlvbl9lbWJlZC9tZXRyaWNzL2lzb19sYWJlbF9zaWwucHk=) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [...ntegration/batch\_integration\_embed/metrics/kBET.py](https://codecov.io/gh/openproblems-bio/openproblems/pull/797?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openproblems-bio#diff-b3BlbnByb2JsZW1zL3Rhc2tzL19iYXRjaF9pbnRlZ3JhdGlvbi9iYXRjaF9pbnRlZ3JhdGlvbl9lbWJlZC9tZXRyaWNzL2tCRVQucHk=) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [...integration/batch\_integration\_embed/metrics/pcr.py](https://codecov.io/gh/openproblems-bio/openproblems/pull/797?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openproblems-bio#diff-b3BlbnByb2JsZW1zL3Rhc2tzL19iYXRjaF9pbnRlZ3JhdGlvbi9iYXRjaF9pbnRlZ3JhdGlvbl9lbWJlZC9tZXRyaWNzL3Bjci5weQ==) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [...ation/batch\_integration\_embed/metrics/sil\_batch.py](https://codecov.io/gh/openproblems-bio/openproblems/pull/797?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openproblems-bio#diff-b3BlbnByb2JsZW1zL3Rhc2tzL19iYXRjaF9pbnRlZ3JhdGlvbi9iYXRjaF9pbnRlZ3JhdGlvbl9lbWJlZC9tZXRyaWNzL3NpbF9iYXRjaC5weQ==) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [...tion/batch\_integration\_embed/metrics/silhouette.py](https://codecov.io/gh/openproblems-bio/openproblems/pull/797?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openproblems-bio#diff-b3BlbnByb2JsZW1zL3Rhc2tzL19iYXRjaF9pbnRlZ3JhdGlvbi9iYXRjaF9pbnRlZ3JhdGlvbl9lbWJlZC9tZXRyaWNzL3NpbGhvdWV0dGUucHk=) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [...tion/batch\_integration\_feature/methods/baseline.py](https://codecov.io/gh/openproblems-bio/openproblems/pull/797?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openproblems-bio#diff-b3BlbnByb2JsZW1zL3Rhc2tzL19iYXRjaF9pbnRlZ3JhdGlvbi9iYXRjaF9pbnRlZ3JhdGlvbl9mZWF0dXJlL21ldGhvZHMvYmFzZWxpbmUucHk=) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | ... and [98 more](https://codecov.io/gh/openproblems-bio/openproblems/pull/797?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openproblems-bio) | | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openproblems-bio). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openproblems-bio)

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[scottgigante-immunai]

Mind converting your review to an approval instead of a comment so I can merge? Thanks!

[wes-lewis]

Tests at https://tower.nf/orgs/openproblems-bio/workspaces/openproblems-bio/watch/MJO29wdT7zRgp

It appears that one of the denoising:Tabula Muris tests failed, but I'm not sure if the error that is shown (137) is a flake. I'm use to looking at github actions rather than NextFlow to gauge whether tests have passed. I'm inclined to merge unless this is seen as a significant issue.

Ed: the overall workflow is passing. Individual jobs failing for 137 is an OOM which is saved by rerunning with more memory.