Closed twpol closed 2 years ago
Property | Value |
---|---|
Posted by | Bill Currey (wjcurrey) |
Date posted | Sat, 15 Dec 2012 03:57:19 GMT |
Added justification Partial fix for justification commit V1366 , speedometer and accuracy need to be address Reduce need of .cvf files being edited in the cab editor
Property | Value |
---|---|
Posted by | ATW (ajtuckerwells) |
Date posted | Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:18:34 GMT |
May there be an option to choose from for fonts. MSTS/Justification or OR/Font size (pre OR way of showing cab fonts on box sizes)?
Property | Value |
---|---|
Posted by | Mike Brady (mjbrady-j) |
Date posted | Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:43:58 GMT |
Probably related - or the same thing. MSTS diesels with glass (digital) control panel have numbers fitting the field for the top 2 but vastly bigger than the field (font much larger) in the bottom 2. Number work as expected - just don't fit the display space.
Property | Value |
---|---|
Posted by | Mike Brady (mjbrady-j) |
Date posted | Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:46:04 GMT |
Sorry, missed something: it's only the brake data that are not displaying correctly. Speed etc. look OK. This is in the default GE panel and in the similar panel used in 3DTS diesels in Cajon & Tehachapi.
Property | Value |
---|---|
Posted by | ATW (ajtuckerwells) |
Date posted | Sun, 24 Mar 2013 21:16:59 GMT |
I think default and bigger screens show fonts and solid/liquid guages show ok because they are big enough, but in other cabs not as big, they dont display well. Load meter in solid/liquid guages start way beyond the 0 lines.
Property | Value |
---|---|
Posted by | James Ross (twpol) |
Date posted | Fri, 31 May 2013 15:03:35 GMT |
Is this a duplicate of bug #1166405? If not, can someone explain clearly what else still needs to be done regarding cab view fonts.
Property | Value |
---|---|
Posted by | ATW (ajtuckerwells) |
Date posted | Mon, 01 Jul 2013 07:02:42 GMT |
The thing I would like to see and am sure others do is an option to choose various font options like these examples I have been seeing up and down with OR with some I like and don't like.
Current font option in 0.9 shows a good font size for default cabs with no numbers going past boxes well because their big but other cabs that tend to be digital small size then default dash9 will have all digital fonts the same no matter what size they are set in cab editor making them look overlap. This font option would= MSTS Default size.
0.7 is what had this size of digital fonts that looked great for small digital screen cabs like this http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/473259_250144611759837_2014470133_o.jpg This font option would= OR Box Size Justification.
Look at this topic and post #13 http://www.trainsim.com/vbts/showthread.php?312321-otto-s-cab/page2
OR 0.7 was a better option in font size for small cabs.
Property | Value |
---|---|
Posted by | Cédric GNIEWEK (sharpeserana) |
Date posted | Sat, 30 Oct 2021 06:37:24 GMT |
Does the problem still happen with version 1.4?
Property | Value |
---|---|
Posted by | Launchpad Janitor (janitor) |
Date posted | Thu, 30 Dec 2021 04:17:54 GMT |
[Expired for Open Rails because there has been no activity for 60 days.]
Imported from https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084132
OR does not honor font justification. This is a design issue and will need a font justification routine.
Also related the reason that 3rd party routes will not have elongated fonts in MSTS but OR does with out adjusting .cvf coordinates. Is that MSTS may be centering on a rectangle both vertically and horizontally, and then using a fixed 4:3 ration for scaling . Where OR use's the height value/16 for font ratio.
As this would be a major change for font rendering will be mulling this around for a while. In the intrim as a go around .cvf files can be edited in the cab editor to align text box's width height values.